Ford Mustang Forums banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
53 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
i have an 84 svo that i got cheap. someone stuck a 5.0 and a 87-93 front clip on. my question: is the track width of the front end, is it wider than the later fox stangs. i put a set of skinnies on the front and they stick out a little past the fender. im pretty sure the front suspension is all stock svo, the rear is a 95 gt 8.8. my brother has the same rim/offset and tire on his 91 5.0 and they are at least an inch inside the fender. i know there are differences in ball joint sytle and the fact that the car origanally had those terrible flat lookin rims makes me think the track width is way wider. sorry for the rant i fiqured road race guys would a know! thanks kevin
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
529 Posts
The LCA is longer on the SVO's and came with special offset wheels to keep the wheel/tire inside the fenders. I believe you can replace them with normal Fox LCAs if you also replace the spindles and struts with Fox parts as well. At one time someone made special spacers to fit Fox LCAs to the SVO spindles. They went over the FOX ball joint studs to make up for the larger diameter studs on the SVOs LCA. If it was me I would just go out and get a set of '96-04 Mustang front spindles and brakes so you can keep the 5 lug wheels and if you use FOX LCAs you will have an offset that you can work with.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
529 Posts
On reading my reply I now remember that the position of the mounts for the LCAs are in a different location on the SVOs, they are further inboard. Using stock FOX LCAs may not be the best ones to use. It may relust in to much positive camber. The '87-'88 T-Bird LCAs are 3/4 inch longer then the FOX and my be a better match for your SVO K member. You may even be able to use '95-'98 SN-95 Mustang LCAs which are about 1 inch longer the the Fox ones and will work with the later model spindles.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
695 Posts
... The '87-'88 T-Bird LCAs are 3/4 inch longer then the FOX and my be a better match for your SVO K member. You may even be able to use '95-'98 SN-95 Mustang LCAs which are about 1 inch longer the the Fox ones and will work with the later model spindles.
Jim,

The T-Bird A-Arms are the same length as the SN95 A-Arms. They are 1.25" longer than Fox A-Arms.

I know that the MPH2 claimed that the T-Bird A-Arms were only 3/4" longer than the Fox A-Arms, but that has proved to be untrue. This has been verified by actual measurements and by checking the Ford part prints.

Thanks,
Vince
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
529 Posts
I am not disputing what you have been told only what I have measured for myself. I owned a a 93R Cobra Mustang from 1995-2006. I modified it with a K member from a '89 Mustang, I also used LCAs form a '87 T-Bird. I made a jig to measure the differences in the locations of the ball joints on both the stock LCAs and the T-Bird LCAs and the differences were 3/4 of an inch.

Alot has been written on the internet about this and I can only say what I have seen for myself.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
695 Posts
Jim,

I will agree that a lot has been posted on the internet about Mustang A-Arm lengths and half of it (at best) is true. I am not going to argue the point with you over the web, but I do not agree with you. I did not personally measure the A-Arms, but a good friend of mine did and then he pulled the prints and verified what he measured.


--Vince
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top