Ford Mustang Forums banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
272 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I am looking at replacing my broken, 27mm cobra rear bar and considering the
Hotchkis, 1" tubular bar. The attachment differs from the standard factory
bar placement as it attaches to both the axle housing and chassis (to the
quad shock mount).

All things being equal, (bar diameter/wall thickness), is there a real
performance advatage to this design? I am running the J&M 3-piece, poly/ball
lower arms with FRP uppers. It's also a bit pricey at $285 from Summit.

The other option of course would be the Eibach, MM 24-25mm solid bars that
mount to the control arms for $100 less. I should mention my current 29mm
front bar, Eibach (Cobra-R) spring/Koni combo with the now busted rear
bar, was fairly well balanced. If anyone is running this bar, or can offer input
on the varius attachment options it would be appreciated.

Thanks,

-Robert
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
739 Posts
I am looking at replacing my broken, 27mm cobra rear bar and considering the
Hotchkis, 1" tubular bar. The attachment differs from the standard factory
bar placement as it attaches to both the axle housing and chassis (to the
quad shock mount).

All things being equal, (bar diameter/wall thickness), is there a real
performance advatage to this design? I am running the J&M 3-piece, poly/ball
lower arms with FRP uppers. It's also a bit pricey at $285 from Summit.

The other option of course would be the Eibach, MM 24-25mm solid bars that
mount to the control arms for $100 less. I should mention my current 29mm
front bar, Eibach (Cobra-R) spring/Koni combo with the now busted rear
bar, was fairly well balanced. If anyone is running this bar, or can offer input
on the varius attachment options it would be appreciated.

Thanks,

-Robert

Robert--

I can get Hotchkis, Steeda, or Eibach rear bars for you.... The Hotchkis bar is effectively stiffer than a 1" mounted in a stock type location (like the Eibach or Steeda).

Hotchkis would be pretty similar to what you had because while it's a softer bar, it's more effective because of how it mounts. All this assumes you can or want to get rid of your quad shocks.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,425 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
272 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
Here is a replacement 25mm solid bar for under $110 shipped. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/F7ZZ5A772AA-Ford-Bar-Rear-Stabilizer-/250725705626 This guy has a feedback rating of 2. :(

I bought one from Hillbank that was sold as a Roush part but it was in fact the Ford superseded bar to replace the 27mm hollow bars that broke. When they were sold as Roush parts they only cost like $60.
Thanks for the tip. I might consider the 25mm bar a potential option, and
would assume the soild bar is similar to the 27mm hollow bar in performance.

-Robert
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
272 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
Robert--

I can get Hotchkis, Steeda, or Eibach rear bars for you.... The Hotchkis bar is effectively stiffer than a 1" mounted in a stock type location (like the Eibach or Steeda).

Hotchkis would be pretty similar to what you had because while it's a softer bar, it's more effective because of how it mounts. All this assumes you can or want to get rid of your quad shocks.
Sam,

Thanks for the info, and yes the quad shocks can go away. I looked over
the install instructions on the Hotchkis bar, and it seems well designed...I
just have to justify the $$ to benifit ratio over the other bars. I will certainly
give you my business if I decide on the Hotchkis piece.

-Robert
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top