Ford Mustang Forums banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,474 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I remember reading on here that someone was having issues with their Griggs K Member and the FPS oil pan. I can't find the thread. I believe it was the front sump pan (https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6675-FT302). I don't remember what the issue was but I am getting ready to buy this and the K Member and wanted to know what I was up against. Also, if anyone is running the Griggs K Member, what kind of pan are you running? Do you think the FPS rear sump pan would clear everything? (https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6675-DRS302)

Thanks for the help.

Ed
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
683 Posts
I've used the DRS302 pan with the Griggs K-member. No problems with fit, engine set back one inch for header clearance reasons. Just going by the photo, the sump on the front sump pan extends almost half the length of the pan which is probably why there are fitment issues especially with steering rack.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
803 Posts
351W Canton Rear sump. Low profile with kick outs. 7Qt. Tight but it fits.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
226 Posts
Motor was set pack maybe 1/4 inch and raised 3/8 of an inch. Dart 302 with grigg's kmember with DRS302 pan.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,474 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
I am not getting the K member that is set back. I am getting the stock location. I am also running a 8.2 Dart block, you think it will clear ok if I get the rear sump setup (DRS302)?
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top