Ford Mustang Forums banner

1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
940 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
i have the MM standard torque arm, panhard, and lower control arms. the thing is, i also like to drag race and i'd like to try some slicks soon. would putting the stock upper control arms on affect my handling?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,800 Posts
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.

The torque arm provides a different arc for the rear end to follow. If you keep the upper control arms on the car, they will fight each other and some serious binding will occur.

You can drag with a torque arm on anyhow....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,554 Posts
I was going to say earlier, I honestly think the T/A would be even better for drag than the upper arms.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
940 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
thanks for the input. but the thing i'm concerned about is breaking/bending the torque arm. it is just the standard version, which according to their website is only good to 400 engine torque with 3.73 gears. i make 320 rwtq and use a 150 shot after 1st gear so i'm concerned what will happen with slicks. i also plan to ditch the nitrous for a blower soon.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,554 Posts
I'd imagine the launch be the hardest part. You dont spray off the line, so I'd think youd be fine.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,800 Posts
Should have went with Griggs severe duty twin tube torque arm from the start. I believe they're good for about 800lbs or so.

If you're already doing 320lbs of torque now and going to add a supercharger, you're going to end up spending the same money twice on a severe duty torque arm.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
940 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
i'm not very good at planning ahead. i guess i can sell the old one then buy a heavy duty or have someone beef it up
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
343 Posts
If he's only using the N2O in second gear and up, shouldn't he be perfectly fine?
My first is 3.37 and second is 1.99. If my math is correct, 400lb-ft in first is the same as 677lb-ft in second. Am I overlooking something?

Until the blower comes in. ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,902 Posts
By your mathematics he'd be pushing 677 when he hit the bottle...isn't that WAY past the range of the standard duty TA? Maybe your math should be 236 lb-ft in second?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,013 Posts
Having been there, done that single-beam, now twin beam (built my own, not Griggs)...

Put the Super-Duty one on there in the first place. If you break, its worthless. Also nothing holding your axle in place will cost $$$ as you pass over your rear suspension left in the road.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Top