Joined
·
3,994 Posts
hoping to have a civil discussion.
this topic has come up alot lately, and i gotta admit, back a few years ago, corral members were not as open to the idea, small port heads need a bigger cam, and large port heads need a smaller cam......... of course this is highly generalized.....
example.....
mild ported p head, wants 300 rwhp. lets assume intake, and exhuast are optimized for this. would require a fairly stout cam, with a fairly tight lsa to achieve this goal, no??
other...... vic jr head, supporting intake, and exhuast, wants 300rwhp. cam would be small, lsa would be wide, powerband theoretically would be broader?
what would the drivability differences be? torque peaks? this is a 302/306 for the street. pump gas, hyd roller cam, because thats what people here (myself included) are used to.
anyone have thoughts? like to hear from buddy, jay, ed (doubtful tho), chris, brian (if he is still around) and anyone else with a thought about it.
this topic has come up alot lately, and i gotta admit, back a few years ago, corral members were not as open to the idea, small port heads need a bigger cam, and large port heads need a smaller cam......... of course this is highly generalized.....
example.....
mild ported p head, wants 300 rwhp. lets assume intake, and exhuast are optimized for this. would require a fairly stout cam, with a fairly tight lsa to achieve this goal, no??
other...... vic jr head, supporting intake, and exhuast, wants 300rwhp. cam would be small, lsa would be wide, powerband theoretically would be broader?
what would the drivability differences be? torque peaks? this is a 302/306 for the street. pump gas, hyd roller cam, because thats what people here (myself included) are used to.
anyone have thoughts? like to hear from buddy, jay, ed (doubtful tho), chris, brian (if he is still around) and anyone else with a thought about it.