SN95 control arms on a narrow fox K-member. Will it work? - Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 3 Old 07-17-2005, 12:17 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
BRGT350's Avatar
 
Trader Feedback: (20)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Grand Haven, MI
Posts: 1,157
SN95 control arms on a narrow fox K-member. Will it work?

Ok, I have searched for an answer to this problem, but not found a clear description of what happens when SN95 control arms are fitted to an early fox k-member. My car has an 84 4-cyl K-member with 87-93 control arms and MM c/c plates. I installed the plates and arms this spring and could only get .5' neg. camber when the plates are adjusted to the stops. The car also has the 87-93 V8 brake upgrade.


Will the SN95 arms clear the current rotors? I had heard there might be an issue there.

With a 16" x 8" wheel and 225 tires, how much will I have to pull the fenders out?

How much track gain will I see with the SN95 arms on the narrow 4-cyl k-member?

Besides track width increase and added camber, is there any other advantages to going with a longer control arm?

Finaly, would I be better off just adding a later model fox K-member and use my current control arms. The car is being built for Solo II ESP and a few track events.

Thanks in advance.


1984 White Mustang T-Top Auto-x/HPDE
#07 CP

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
for my Mustang build and racing info

2011 White Fiesta SES Hatch
Ex-Ford Fiesta Movement Agent and Expert
BRGT350 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 3 Old 07-17-2005, 01:09 PM
Registered User
 
Toys's Avatar
 
Trader Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 654
I assume you found this thread in your search where I posted the following:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toys
I did this same swap to my 82 GT with a lot of time invested in researching the differences not only between Fox and SN95 parts but also early Fox vs. late Fox.

I started out building the car with Fox length control arms, SN95 spindles, Cobra rotors / calipers, and 2000 Cobra R Bilstein struts. Goes together fine except you won't be able to achieve much more that - 1.5 deg camber. This is because the older Fox k-members are ½" per side narrower for a total of 1" narrower track width vs the later model Fox. I believe the change happened in 87? I'd have to dig out my notes.

Next phase of the build was to add the mysterious 87-88 Turbo T-Bird arms said to be ¾" longer to add additional neg camber adjustability. Thought this would be the hot ticket, not. Laying a set of T-Bird arms next to SN95 arms they come out to be the same length. Many people also believe the SN95 arms to be ¾" longer than the Fox arms, wrong again. If true, we should be able to put the SN95, or T-Bird arms, on our cars with 1/2" per side further inboard lower control arm mounting holes and only gain ¼ " per side in track width over a stock late model Fox. The SN95 arms are actually 1.33" longer than the Fox parts. This creates major fender clearance issues and more neg camber than desired.

So.....what I did was to find another k-member and move the control arm mounting holes inboard to allow for SN95 arms. ½" for old fox k-members, 1" for newer fox k-members, net gain in track width = .33" per side compared to a late model Fox. Much more manageable from a clearance and camber adjustment standpoint.

While I was at it, I moved the mounting holes up .80" to improve camber gain and roll center height. I believe I now have ¾ degrees of neg camber gain through compressive travel, would have to check the notes again for exact numbers.


Hope this helps....
SN95 arms on your 1/2" per side narrower 84 k-member will give you 0.83" per side additional track width over the say a 93 k-member with stock Fox arms. If you don't mind rolling fender lips and pulling them outward it might be the hot ticket. The longer arms are going to give you a better camber curve. Also, the older k-member have a high control arm mounting point which is better for roll center height on lowered cars.

Let me know if you plan to stop by Gingerman next weekend (23-24th), I'll bring the prints so you can see for yourself.


Toys - gota have'm.....


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Mike Schneider

1982 Mustang GT - 408w and other super zoomy stuff...
Tracks driven: Mid-Ohio, Grattan, Putnam Park, Gingerman, Autobahn Country Club, Waterford Hills, Ford Proving Grounds, and Bondurant.
Toys is offline  
post #3 of 3 Old 07-18-2005, 07:31 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
BRGT350's Avatar
 
Trader Feedback: (20)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Grand Haven, MI
Posts: 1,157
thanks Mike,
I had read that post, but just wanted to make sure I was on the right track with my thoughts of the narrow k-member. After going to the AI race this weekend, I had a few new idea's about what to do with the front suspension. I am not sure about the SVTOA event this coming weekend. My brother will be there for sure, but I might be stuck at home with projects.

Would I use fox or SN95 balljoints? Also are there any differences between the 4 cyl (non SVO) and V8 k-members? I thought they carried different part numbers in the Ford Parts computer.

1984 White Mustang T-Top Auto-x/HPDE
#07 CP

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
for my Mustang build and racing info

2011 White Fiesta SES Hatch
Ex-Ford Fiesta Movement Agent and Expert
BRGT350 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome