11.65" rear disc upgrade - Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum
  • 1 Post By qtrracer
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 5 Old 08-26-2019, 02:54 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: new york
Posts: 17
11.65" rear disc upgrade

i am looking to convert my rear to cobra style 11.65" disc brakes but keeping the stock brakes upfront on my 93, would there be any braking issues running larger diameter brakes in the rear than the front? I would use the 1" 93 cobra master along with proportioning valve.

mustangkid89 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 5 Old 08-26-2019, 05:02 PM
Registered User
TaraFirma's Avatar
Trader Feedback: (11)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,200
I would gut the stock proportioning valve and get the adjustable willwood valve. you can customize the bias you need for your car.

To fly is Heavenly, to hover is divine.
Don't let your mouth write a check your a$$ can't cash.
TaraFirma is offline  
post #3 of 5 Old 08-28-2019, 04:25 PM
Registered User
qtrracer's Avatar
Trader Feedback: (34)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,369
The short answer is yes. Brake torque bias will be 64.7/35.3 F/R. Typically, we want a Mustang to have about a 70/30 brake torque bias. The imbalance means that there is more rear bias for a front heavy car than there should be. The result will be poor stopping distances since the front brakes are not contributing as much as they should while the rear brakes are likely to lock in dive (rear jacking). Keep in mind that the prop valve cannot correct brake torque bias imbalances. The prop valve can only move the knee-point (point where pressure is reduced in panic type stops) up and down the rear brake pressure slope. If not in a panic stop, the prop valve is non-active pass-through.

With the above said, this can be done but the risk of a brake induced spin-out goes way up. You should remedy the imbalance with a Cobra front conversion as soon as possible.
pkstang likes this.
qtrracer is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #4 of 5 Old 08-29-2019, 03:13 PM
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (11)
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Where the Navy sends me...
Posts: 4,150
Or running less aggressive pads in the rear than in the front would be a cheaper/easier way to address the front/rear bias.

And yes, I realize that's kind of counter-productive, but it's an option.

'89 GT convertible, N/A 357W, MM front susp w/425# coil-overs and Koni D/As, MM TA/PB rear setup (Koni Yellows, 390-430# springs), Stoptech 332mm / 12" Baers, MM 6 point rollbar, Maier 1.5" flared fenders & quarters, 18x9.5" front/18x10.5" rear Enkei RPF-1s (street), 18x10" CCW C-10s (track), etc...
Patrick Olsen is offline  
post #5 of 5 Old 09-06-2019, 04:33 PM
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 5
For what it’s worth my 88 notch is running an 01 cobra irs outback with stock 93 calipers in the front and I do track days with no issues running back to back sessions. The front pads are hawk hp+ and the rears are parts store pads. That being said I do have sn95 spindles in the garage just trying to figure out what brakes I want to do on the front.
Chuck_D is offline  
Sponsored Links


Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome