New 79-04 Mustang Autocross YouTube Channel - Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum
 1Likes
  • 1 Post By Warhorse Racing
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 26 Old 02-16-2019, 05:04 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
New 79-04 Mustang Autocross YouTube Channel

Hey Everyone,

I wanted to share a project I’ve been working on…

My Warhorse Racing YouTube channel is all about getting more horses on autocross courses.

I’ve autocrossed Mustangs and instructed novices for several years. I was looking for a YouTube channel that offers honest, real world, race-tested reviews of performance parts and provides autocrossing tips for people who love Mustangs (especially 79-04 Mustangs!). I couldn’t find one… so I created one.

The videos showcase mods made to my 1992 GT, IRS-swapped 2000 GT, and the “Mustang ST”, my IRS-swapped 2004 V6 CAM-C project car. I review chassis bracing components, bolt-on power parts, weight-reduction mods, brake upgrades, front suspension, SRA and IRS improvements.

Every part I installed on these cars was put to the test during many autocross events. In the crowded CAM PAX class in my two local autocross clubs, these cars took 1st and 2nd in season points in 2016, and 2nd and 3rd in 2017 and 2018.

If I can do that, anyone can.

I’m NOT sponsored by any company. I’m NOT trying to sell anything. I DON’T make money off this channel. I created it to inspire people to autocross their Mustangs and help them make informed decisions about what they need and don’t need to make their cars faster on course.
If you’ve ever thought about autocrossing your 79-04 Mustang, please check out the channel. I’ll be posting more tips and reviews as I improve the cars and my driving in 2019!

Thanks!

I.C.E likes this.
Warhorse Racing is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 26 Old 02-17-2019, 06:18 PM
Registered User
 
Jack Hidley's Avatar
 
Trader Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Danville, CA USA
Posts: 2,963
Nicely done videos. No stupid, annoying music on them.

Do you want comments added to them?


Jack Hidley
Maximum Motorsports Tech Support
Jack Hidley is offline  
post #3 of 26 Old 02-17-2019, 07:50 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
Thanks! My goal is to focus on information. Helpful and relevant comments are fine.
Warhorse Racing is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 26 Old 03-06-2019, 02:26 PM
Registered User
 
EscortSportage's Avatar
 
Trader Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,922
Garage
Im all track here (time attack) my youtube channel is EscortSportage as well.

instagram.com/escortsportage
Sponsors: MaximumMotorsports,liwrap,Stinger-Performance,Cosmis Racing Wheels
2480LBS
306W
EscortSportage is offline  
post #5 of 26 Old 03-14-2019, 04:17 PM
Registered User
 
Nitrous Al's Avatar
 
Trader Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,525
I just subscribed to both channels. I want to try a road course and/or auto cross at some point.

'88 5.0 GT hatch AOD 3.08
stock 302, Ed Curtis cam & 11R 190 heads,
Holley SM2, 320 hp 332 tq to the wheels
Nitrous Al is offline  
post #6 of 26 Old 03-14-2019, 05:42 PM
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Metairie,LA
Posts: 142
Definitely interested. Good work guys!

Ride: 1995 GT ... work in progress ...
| Factory 302 SB | 195 Canfields | RPM2 Intake | CI Cam | Probe Shafts 1.6 | 80mm PMAS | 39# Inj | Tweecer R/T | Mac LTs 1 3/4 | Pro chamber 3" | Mac Cat-back 3" |
I.C.E is offline  
post #7 of 26 Old 03-14-2019, 11:53 PM
Corral Elite Member
 
Cantbuyitright's Avatar
 
Trader Feedback: (56)
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 860
Garage
This channel = badass thank you.
Cantbuyitright is offline  
post #8 of 26 Old 03-19-2019, 04:31 PM
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Cameron Park, CA
Posts: 124
Interesting youtube channel. I like that you are succinct and just get to the facts.

I do have a question regarding your choice of lower chassis brace. Why did you choose Stifflers vs Maximum Motorsports or QA-1 or any other?
SilverGT1 is online now  
post #9 of 26 Old 03-19-2019, 09:24 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
Thanks for checking out my channel. I try to make it as informative as possible.

I went with the Stiffler's Lower Chassis Brace for 2 reasons:

1. When I discovered the Stifflers brace didn't work on my 2000 GT convertible (it hit the factory convertible chassis brace), Brian at Stifflers actually made a custom brace that would work with the factory brace in place. I will always reward that kind of great customer service with loyalty.

2. I have been really impressed with the Stifflers products I've used on my autocross cars. They are strong and light. And you can really feel the difference after you install them.

MM and QA1 are both known for making quality parts. While I recommend the Stifflers LCB, I think any 4-point brace will improve your car's ability to attack the cones.
Warhorse Racing is offline  
post #10 of 26 Old 03-20-2019, 08:50 AM
Registered User
 
Cornman's Avatar
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 5
Subscribed on YouTube. Thank you for this!! I am in need of Fox based info for Autocross/Road Racing.

Thanks!

Cornman is offline  
post #11 of 26 Old 03-20-2019, 01:02 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
I'm really glad people are finding the channel helpful. I'm happy to answer any of your questions about autocrossing your Fox.
Warhorse Racing is offline  
post #12 of 26 Old 03-26-2019, 04:36 AM
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 17
Thumbs up from me.
Jmac509 is offline  
post #13 of 26 Old 03-26-2019, 10:27 AM
Corral Elite Member
 
Peter92lx's Avatar
 
Trader Feedback: (2)
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 412
Great channel man I've been really enjoying your videos.
Peter92lx is online now  
post #14 of 26 Old 03-26-2019, 04:25 PM
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: DeKalb, IL.
Posts: 521
I was going to use a set of MM subframe connectors for my new (to me) '95, but I really like the added strength of the Stiffler's FIT solution, and will be going that route.

Thanks for the videos, I think you have put a lot of thought, and research into the modifications you have made. Your results bear witness to that fact, well done!

Obviously you are a staunch advocate for the IRS in these cars, have you had much experience with them in solid rear axle form? Do you think they are capable of considerably better performance with IRS?

Jay
petmotel is online now  
post #15 of 26 Old 03-26-2019, 10:09 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
I've used the FIT System in 2 cars (one is a convertible). It will make the car much stiffer than ordinary subframe connectors. In my opinion, the FIT System is perfect for autocross cars.

Thanks for the compliment! I'm really happy people are watching. I want to get as many of these cars out on autocross courses as possible! I've got some cool stuff coming up and I will post more videos soon.

My 1992 GT is a solid-axle car. My 2000 GT was a solid-axle car for 4 seasons. I won two local championships in those cars (2015, 2016). But, modern cars eligible to run in CAM-C are incredibly capable from the factory. And they are all IRS cars. It got harder to keep up with them in a solid-axle car.

I was able to autocross my 2000 GT with the SRA and a few weeks later with the IRS. I can tell you the car is MUCH better with the IRS. It's more composed in slaloms and sweepers, and you can get on the throttle earlier.

But, that doesn't mean autocrossing a solid-axle car is a waste of time. I know (and have been beaten by) people driving some really fast SRA cars. And the aftermarket has some great stuff for the SRA these days. Yes, I prefer an IRS, but I know plenty of people who prefer the SRA.

The coolest part about these cars is that you can build them to suit your driving style. I hope my videos are showing people that you can be competitive in any 79-04 Mustang.
Warhorse Racing is offline  
post #16 of 26 Old 03-27-2019, 12:48 AM
Registered User
 
Jack Hidley's Avatar
 
Trader Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Danville, CA USA
Posts: 2,963
Warhorse,

Whenever you make a comparison of a SRA to an IRS, I think it would help everyone who reads the comments if you described whether each one is fixed or not. In stock form the SRA is over constrained and the IRS has too much bushing compliance. In both cases, this severely handicaps each systems performance. Without knowing if one or the other was fixed, readers can't really evaluate your comments about them.

Jack Hidley
Maximum Motorsports Tech Support
Jack Hidley is offline  
post #17 of 26 Old 03-27-2019, 11:08 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
Jack,

That’s a very good point. Thank you.

My 1992 GT and 2000 GT solid-axles were modified with Steeda Upper and Lower Control Arms, the Steeda Adjustable Rear Sway Bar, Tokico Illumina Adjustable Shocks, and 23mm factory rear sway bars. Neither car used coil-overs.

This was the SRA setup from the “Budget Autocross” videos I posted (I didn’t use the BMR spherical diff housing bushings, but I would put them on a solid-axle car if I autocrossed one today). These mods added adjustability and helped mitigate “quadra-bind”. They completely changed the handling characteristics of the car. They made it much more predictable. And they were relatively inexpensive.

I use Full Tilt Boogie Racing upgrades on my IRS cars. The IRS mods work to eliminate the slop inherent in the factory parts. There are a lot of bushings in the IRS suspension that are designed for comfort, not performance. That’s what leads to wheel hop and a general feeling of “vagueness” in the rear end. The FTBR mods take care of both issues by removing the weak links in the IRS.

As an instructor, I have autocrossed lots of stock SRA and IRS 79-04 cars. The common denominator between the two suspensions is that, in stock form, it’s difficult to know exactly when you can get on the throttle. Hesitation costs you time on course; so does a lack of confidence in your inputs (throttle and steering). Modifying the SRA and IRS allows you to know exactly what the rear end is doing.

Having said all of that, I don’t want to give readers the impression that they shouldn’t bother autocrossing a stock SRA or IRS car. Driving a car with flaws will often teach you more than driving a fully-prepped car.
Warhorse Racing is offline  
post #18 of 26 Old 03-27-2019, 03:03 PM
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: DeKalb, IL.
Posts: 521
The reason I am asking about the potential of the rear suspension is that I'm currently trying to decide how to outfit my (new to me) '95. This car is destined for daily driver duty, as well as possible open track, and/or autocross fun times.

I already have a road course specific '95 with a serious 363, and the full MM catalog, PHB, and Torque arm SRA. As Jack pointed out, that is a completely different animal than a stock quadrabind. I will either go that route or a fully upgraded IRS on the new car, but in order to avoid upgrading the wrong style of axle, I need to make a decision first.

If there is little to no ultimate performance difference between the two, the SRA would be my choice due to weight, strength, simplicity, availability, and maintenance concerns. All that being said, I think the coolness factor of an IRS is off the charts, and I know there are elements (such as hitting a berm on the road course) where the IRS would remain significantly more composed. Decisions, decisions.


Jay
petmotel is online now  
post #19 of 26 Old 03-27-2019, 06:33 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
Jay,

My experience is solely based in autocross, so I won’t comment on what suspension will be better on track.

Based on years of driving and riding along in Mustangs with all sorts of suspension mods from every aftermarket company out there, and looking under the cars I compete against, my humble opinion is that a prepped IRS is better than a prepped SRA. The most common elements at an autocross are slaloms and sweepers. Composure in those elements is critical, and it impacts how hard you can attack. The limit is further out with a good IRS setup. I had to push well past my comfort zone to find the limit after switching to IRS cars. But, once you recognize that the limit is further out, and the car is more composed and capable, it’s easy to take advantage of the improved handling. Essentially, the car gets better and encourages you to get better.

It’s a testament to the great aftermarket companies we have supporting these cars that your decision isn’t an easy one to make. But, I wouldn’t decide on anything until you’ve had a chance to drive a prepped IRS car in a performance setting.
Warhorse Racing is offline  
post #20 of 26 Old 03-28-2019, 01:49 AM
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: DeKalb, IL.
Posts: 521
I would like to take this opportunity to again thank you for your videos, and specifically taking the time to share your wealth of knowledge with this community. I have little doubt that there are many individuals frequenting these boards (or not) whom also have a vast amount of knowledge concerning many topics relevant here, many not sharing their wisdom for a variety of reasons. I treasure those that do!

I will take your advice to heart and try to find a ride in a well prepped IRS car if the opportunity presents itself.

Jay
petmotel is online now  
post #21 of 26 Old 03-28-2019, 06:00 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
Jay,

Honestly, I feel like I should be thanking you and all the people out there who are taking the time to watch my videos. I’ve been amazed by the response so far. I’m committed to making the channel a great resource for 79-04 Mustang owners looking to get into autocross.

These cars and this sport mean a lot to me. And it means a lot to know the channel is helping people.

Whichever suspension you decide on, take that car to an autocross and show everyone what these Mustangs can do!
Warhorse Racing is offline  
post #22 of 26 Old 05-07-2019, 05:36 AM
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: OHIO
Posts: 25
This is great, learned a good bit!!! How do you feel about using spherical upper control arms vs the BMR spherical bearing? Also, what are your thoughts about using strange adjustable shocks and struts vs Tokico? I have a set of used rear strange shocks that I picked up for a good price?

Thanks.
JohnnyWalker is offline  
post #23 of 26 Old 05-07-2019, 09:48 PM
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: OHIO
Posts: 25
Also, what master cylinder did you use for the Cobra setup, and is there anything that can be done to the control arms when you use lowering springs to keep them parallel with the ground?

Thanks.
JohnnyWalker is offline  
post #24 of 26 Old 05-09-2019, 09:03 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
JohnnyWalker,

The spherical UCA would work WITH the spherical diff housing bearing to help with bind. You will get more NVH with that combination. The UCA and the diff bearing are solving two parts of the bind issue. Ideally, you would want to improve BOTH areas. If you have to choose one or the other, do the diff housing bearing.

I do not have personal experience with Strange adjustable shocks & struts. I know the Tokicos are getting harder to find. Many people I race with are using adjustable Koni Yellow shocks & struts, and they like them. But, honestly, any decent quality adjustable shocks & struts will improve the handling. It's probably better to match the front struts to the rear shocks you have than to mix and match.


From 94-04, you can use the factory V6/GT master cylinder with Cobra brakes. I used the factory master cylinder on my 2000 GT and my 2004 V6 and it works fine. When I put Cobra brakes on my Fox, I used a 1993 Cobra master cylinder.

I'm assuming you mean the front control arms? I don't lower my cars very much at all. And I use poly isolators to add some ride height. On a stock K-member, you don't have the option of moving the A-arm position up or down. If your car is really low, you might have to use a bump steer kit. I use Ford Racing M-5300-C front springs on my GT and Steeda Sport front springs on my V6 and I haven't felt the need to use a bump steer kit.
Warhorse Racing is offline  
post #25 of 26 Old 05-20-2019, 09:15 PM
Registered User
 
Not Important's Avatar
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Portsmouth, Ohio
Posts: 2
Really like the videos and even subscribed to the channel. Makes me want to give it a try myself!

Just be yourself, I'll like you better that way.
Not Important is offline  
post #26 of 26 Old 05-20-2019, 11:34 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 11
Thanks for checking out the videos and subscribing! You should absolutely try autocrossing. It is the safest, most-accessible grassroots motorsport. It's fun whether your car is bone stock or heavily-modified. And the people are friendly and helpful. You will have a blast!
Warhorse Racing is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
79-04 mustang autocross, autocross, autocross suspension, autocross tips, mustang autocross

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1971 Mustang Fastback Project kyb88 Member Build-Up Projects 0 09-03-2011 07:44 PM
Misc. Parts myersmij79 Miscellaneous Mustang Parts 8 09-03-2009 02:42 PM
Tons of 79 -93 mustang parts Fox body Mustang20 Exterior Parts 32 08-16-2005 02:07 PM
Trade my MUSTANG GT COBRA 1990 for a 94-98 mustang. 97greenstang Mustangs For Sale/Wanted ARCHIVE 8 06-24-2003 06:30 PM
Mach 1 Inafo & Specs Cobro GT & SOHC 2 05-10-2002 04:13 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome