Go Back   Corral Forums > General Tech Forums > Drag Racing

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-27-2006, 06:03 PM   #1
AidanN20
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (15)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 1,088

UPR vs TeamZ vs Wolfe Rear suspension setup, whos the best?

I am leaning toward UPR's pro series setup for my 94 cobra with antiroll bar etc..but im really looking to make sure whatever I put on it is the best stuff available. I need this car to go 1.2-1.3 60 fts on 28x10.5W with a minitub...


UPR is the best price which is why I was leaning toward it...anyone have anything to share if wolfes bad dude setup or Team Z's is better or worse and why?
__________________
90 Mustang LX, 23k orig miles. Factory mint in/out. LSx Single Turbo S-91.5mm, Vasco th400, chance converter, Strange 8.8". 2700lb,
89 Notchback - Stock shortblock 88k mile LS1, th350, 3.73/28" M&H - 8.8", 9.9 @ 144 - 2850 raceweight.
AidanN20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 06:31 PM   #2
chevymustang
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: st pete florida
Posts: 69

i just put the wolfe racecraft in my car and it was a breeze to put in, havent run the car with it but it is real nice quality and i have three buddies with it and they love it.
chevymustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 06:43 PM   #3
stang9
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 297

Can't really say if its better or not but I have the Team Z setup and really like it. Dave at Team Z gives top notch service and is really easy to work with, he even took time out on a saturday morning to fit me in to weld up my anti roll bar. So like I said no experience with the other stuff but Team Z gets my vote.
stang9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 09:39 PM   #4
nate-roth
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS
Posts: 528

I'm very happy witht the upr set-up. I doubt too many people have tried both. Also never heard anything but positive things about both products.
__________________
1990 Notch
302, TFS Top End Kit, PA C4, 3800 Edge Converter, 150hp NX, UPR Pro Series Rear, 4.10's Moser axles

6.84 at 98.72 1/8 Mile Best, trying to get better weekly
nate-roth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 10:28 PM   #5
blwnfivoh
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lambertville
Posts: 565

i just got through with my team z install, should have results in a few wks. I will give Dave huge props he is always willing to take time out of his day to answer any question you may have.
__________________
White 89 GT
More show than go
blwnfivoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 11:28 PM   #6
ONABUDGET
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 773

I know with the wolfe set up with the mini ladder bar. That is crazy as far as hooking. you cant not hook with that. I dont think they are selling that though. I know you must set the rear up way diff. with that also. I've never seen Team z stuff, but hear its good. UPR stuff works real good and is by far the cheapest of the 3. Ronnie wilson has been 1.16 60' with the UPR rear suspension of course with wheelie bars, but thats besides the point. It works.
ONABUDGET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 11:50 PM   #7
Newt-Rod
Registered User
 
Newt-Rod's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: kentucky
Posts: 702

Guys there is one company you all are over looking and I think you should take time to look at. Its www.baselinesuspensions.com. I have been running this stuff on my car. On all motor it went

6.22@114 with a 1.37 60' on a 275/60/15 m/t drag radial this was with a 5.13 gear setup for the 1/8th mile

now we just put twin turbos on the car and took it this past weekend to log some air to fuel ratio and to check everything out. We only run on 4lbs of boost. Just makin some shakedown passes.

changed gear for the turbos setting the car up for the 1/4 mile so really didn't turn the rpms we needed, but will be there when we up the boost

car went

6.10@115 with a 1.40 60' This was leaving on the brake at 4000 with straight up hook. I know its not much faster, but this was just 4lbs of boost and a major gear change.

here is a little video for ya.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/b...2a0000f368.htm

Just check baseline out and then make the call.

thanks
newt-rod
__________________
http://i3.tinypic.com/wiswnc.jpg
quicktimeturbosystems.com
teamzmotorsports.com

Last edited by Newt-Rod; 08-27-2006 at 11:53 PM.
Newt-Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 06:07 PM   #8
AidanN20
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (15)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 1,088

I think ill pass on the baselinesuspensions and stick to the proven setups that have went 7's-8's on many mustangs....
__________________
90 Mustang LX, 23k orig miles. Factory mint in/out. LSx Single Turbo S-91.5mm, Vasco th400, chance converter, Strange 8.8". 2700lb,
89 Notchback - Stock shortblock 88k mile LS1, th350, 3.73/28" M&H - 8.8", 9.9 @ 144 - 2850 raceweight.
AidanN20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 06:20 PM   #9
maxqstang
Registered User
 
maxqstang's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 93

its more of a toss up on the 3.

Ronnie Wilson has been 7.70s with the UPR setup on a 28x10.5 tire
Wolfe has been 7.40s on a drag radial in a customers car
A lot of NMRA guys run the Team Z stuff...Trace, Phil Clemmons, Joe Shober, etc.

I've had the wolfe stuff before and its great. Ronnie and Jeremy Martorella gave me a lot of info about the UPR setup and I think thats what I'm going ot try. They are also a contingency sponsor for some classes so that means a lot to me.
__________________
Bout 350 Motorsports
91 Victory Red LX hatch 302/ T5
B&M shifter, 3.73s, pullies, h-pipe w/ dumped Flows
maxqstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2006, 04:40 PM   #10
jim travers
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 198

just tossed my upr stuff for wolfe, wolfe is better quality
__________________
see my car WWW.STEENRACING.COM , new turbo build in progress staying 4.6 2V
old 2V setup with novi 2000 = 789 rwhp, 590 tq
9.05 @ 152.86 on bfg drag radials
jim travers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 09:14 PM   #11
superstocker
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Toledo ohio
Posts: 276

The baselinesuspension stuff is the same idea as the TeamZ stuff. Two of my buddies just went to TeamZ set-ups but haven't ran there cars yet. They get my vote for the simple fact I've seen there cars launch and I know there stuff works.
__________________
85 GT- TFS wedge heads, RPM air gap, 650 quick fuel, AFM N41, 1 5/8 shorties, H-pipe, Flows, SSM upper/ lowers, strange front struts/coil overs, LibertyT-5, 4.30's, 28x9 Et drags

99GT- 4.10's, Diablo tuner, Mac cold-air, C&L elbow, PP 75mm TB, x-pipe, flowmasters, 315 BFG DR's 13.15@103
superstocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 11:54 PM   #12
blwnfivoh
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lambertville
Posts: 565

Quote:
Originally Posted by AidanN20
I think ill pass on the baselinesuspensions and stick to the proven setups that have went 7's-8's on many mustangs....
Kevin knows his stuff and it HAS been proven. If Team Z wasnt so close to my home and so convenient, i would have went with Baseline.
__________________
White 89 GT
More show than go
blwnfivoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 03:26 AM   #13
tireburner163
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (16)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Meridian, Mississippi
Posts: 2,537

Quote:
Originally Posted by AidanN20
I think ill pass on the baselinesuspensions and stick to the proven setups that have went 7's-8's on many mustangs....




ummmmm.......BaseLine's stuff IS proven and HAS gone 7's and 8's on many mustangs.
__________________
1993 coupe. Boss block 347, 76mm turbo, glide, AEM EMS, etc, etc

"Just turn the boost up.....it's only air."
tireburner163 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 03:27 AM   #14
tireburner163
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (16)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Meridian, Mississippi
Posts: 2,537

I would go with Wolfe, Team Z, or Baseline
__________________
1993 coupe. Boss block 347, 76mm turbo, glide, AEM EMS, etc, etc

"Just turn the boost up.....it's only air."
tireburner163 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 04:27 AM   #15
AidanN20
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (15)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 1,088

Please reference me to a 7 second mustang with baseline suspension setup?? I'm not bashing, im interested in seeing proven results.

I hate to be the guinea pig on stuff so I like to use whatever has already been proven....
__________________
90 Mustang LX, 23k orig miles. Factory mint in/out. LSx Single Turbo S-91.5mm, Vasco th400, chance converter, Strange 8.8". 2700lb,
89 Notchback - Stock shortblock 88k mile LS1, th350, 3.73/28" M&H - 8.8", 9.9 @ 144 - 2850 raceweight.
AidanN20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 11:57 AM   #16
Newt-Rod
Registered User
 
Newt-Rod's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: kentucky
Posts: 702

Mine is probably not a 7 second player but low 8's for sure. The last thing I am worried about is the Baseline Suspension on my car. Its there. I have been as good as a 1.37 60' on drag radials with this setup. I am very confident in it working and working well
__________________
http://i3.tinypic.com/wiswnc.jpg
quicktimeturbosystems.com
teamzmotorsports.com
Newt-Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 10:35 PM   #17
Adrenalin
Registered User
 
Adrenalin's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lakeland, Fl.
Posts: 841

Quote:
Originally Posted by jim travers
just tossed my upr stuff for wolfe, wolfe is better quality

I can't add my opinion from experience, but I have done alot of searching, and have seen several posts where UPRs Anti-Roll bar ends/linkages have often broken in the same situations where Wolfes has not. As far as baseline goes, I didn't see too much about them or much about TeamZs.

Wolfes are a more expensive, but I think I'm leaning towards them. I would rather pay a little more and have that peace of mind. I'd also like to see more responses. So I suppose I'm subscribing as well.
__________________
Fquick.com/Adrenalin - The project is on hold for a bit, but it's not going anywhere.
Adrenalin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 11:51 PM   #18
neal@artcarr
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Art Carr
Posts: 73

I have 2 cars with the Wolfe Suspension on it and I'll never use anything else.

David Wolfe ran a 7.40 @ 197 at WFC9 on Drag Radials !! .........nuff said.

To add insult to injury he was .2X faster than the Outlaw cars(who were on slicks) at that event. .......those cars included Urist, Burton, and the rest of the fast guys.

You can use the Copy-cat stuff if you want to but Wolfe invented it !!

go see for yourself........www.wolferacecraft.com
neal@artcarr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2006, 07:48 AM   #19
88gtguy
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 1,582

Quote:
Originally Posted by neal@artcarr
I have 2 cars with the Wolfe Suspension on it and I'll never use anything else.

David Wolfe ran a 7.40 @ 197 at WFC9 on Drag Radials !! .........nuff said.

To add insult to injury he was .2X faster than the Outlaw cars(who were on slicks) at that event. .......those cars included Urist, Burton, and the rest of the fast guys.

You can use the Copy-cat stuff if you want to but Wolfe invented it !!

go see for yourself........www.wolferacecraft.com
but he has that torque arm thing on the car also.... big help.

I have all wolfe on my car, I can't complain.. I've been a best of 1.37 with it. And I belive I'd be in the low 30's high 20's if not for converter issues.
__________________
SB/NOS 5.31@133 1/8 1.28 60' @ 3130#'s on a 275 radial
88gtguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 11:27 PM   #20
slowfive0
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Utica, MI USA
Posts: 261

I have 2 friends that run the Team Z equipment. One has been a 1.28 60 on a 325/50R15 Drag Radial. The other has been a 1.26 60 on a 28/10.5R15 Slick. I also have the same equipment on my car.

Dave (Team Z) did my cage work and I went with his suspension as well. He is a racer and supports his product. He will help you get your suspension dialed in. Plus he is in my backyard!

2nd choice would definitely be Kevin. He is awesome and is probably one of the most supportive people I've met on-line. Very honest and a good person. Knows his **** too!

Wolf is awesome and works just fine. Very proven product.

UPR is out there and works, but I think isn't the strongest. I've heard of a lot of racers breaking heim ends, etc at the 8 second level and faster. For that matter, I think I've heard of some slower racers breaking parts too! I'll let those guys post their experiences. I think they get used a lot because of the cheap price and contingency?

Good luck either way you go.
__________________
1993 Calypso Green Notch
364" Dart 8.2 deck motor
Ported TFS Twisted Wedges
Procharger D2R with Cogs
slowfive0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2006, 11:51 AM   #21
jim travers
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 198

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adrenalin
I can't add my opinion from experience, but I have done alot of searching, and have seen several posts where UPRs Anti-Roll bar ends/linkages have often broken in the same situations where Wolfes has not. As far as baseline goes, I didn't see too much about them or much about TeamZs.

Wolfes are a more expensive, but I think I'm leaning towards them. I would rather pay a little more and have that peace of mind. I'd also like to see more responses. So I suppose I'm subscribing as well.
get wolfe, it was a major p.i.t.a. just to grind out my welds to get the new anti roll bar plates in, took like 6 hours
__________________
see my car WWW.STEENRACING.COM , new turbo build in progress staying 4.6 2V
old 2V setup with novi 2000 = 789 rwhp, 590 tq
9.05 @ 152.86 on bfg drag radials
jim travers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2006, 01:15 PM   #22
jonathan
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,324

All 4 companies are great, but Kevin(baseline) has the best customer service of the bunch, and UPR charges prices that aren't hilarious.
__________________
Rotating the Earth 1320 feet at a time.

Beaters: '85 GT, '89 LX
http://www.damnthatsfast.ca
jonathan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2006, 02:06 PM   #23
badloser
racing on a 275
 
badloser's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (49)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: treasure coast,FL
Posts: 2,017

I am happy with the UPR set up I think it is the best for the money.
__________________
Boss block 4V turbo build up
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuOY3B5RJ2U
creperformance 08/09 NMCA street radial world champ
badloser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2006, 10:46 PM   #24
BlackSunshine02
Registered User
 
BlackSunshine02's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: was from NJ/ Now Jax FL
Posts: 1,272

I will toss in my vote for UPR, I love it and them being sponors of races doesn't hurt.
__________________
Criminally Insane Racing
2002 Mustang GT Blk/Blk 5speed with 3.90's and a 125shot

Member of Black Mustang Club.com
BlackSunshine02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2006, 02:27 AM   #25
Notchfire
Registered User
 
Notchfire's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 536

my vote for wolfe here! just put it in so no results yet, but real quality parts.
__________________
hatch on 275's. where's the confusion?
Notchfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2006, 10:05 PM   #26
Redsnk95
PMS Tuning Forum Moderator
 
Redsnk95's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,578

I have the full on baseline kit on my car, going to test this week. While I have no proven results I will say the quality of the parts of truly top notch. Kevin has gone above and beyond with any and all special requests that I have made. Kevin also includes a chassis plot and has wonderful customer service on what adjustments are to be made, and he actually explains in depth his recommendations...not just do this, he explains to me why he think said adjustment would be best to test and how it will affect my car and how it hits the tires.. I'm glad that my rear suspension is something that I will never have to worry about again.

That being said, there are few TT5 cars here locally that run low 8s/high 7s on TeamZ equipment along with a few Wolfe equipped cars that run the same times. IMO all three have quality equipment but it comes down to customer service and support. Kevin offers top notch support, I've heard that Dave at TeamZ is willing to help out quite a bit with settings, I don't know much about Wolfe in that department. How well a car hooks will be in the hands of the user...like tuning a car and we generally get some help in that area from a qualified person.

Any of the three choices will be a good one, but my vote is to Kevin.
__________________
Troy
1995 Mustang Cobra
347ci 10.52 @ 127.74 NA-Pump Gas (gone)
New Project in the works.
2009 F150 Lariat *tow truck*

http://www.stangtuning.com
Redsnk95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2006, 09:02 AM   #27
boss69302
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pinckney MI
Posts: 145

Opinions

All of the companies make good products, and work well if installed correctly. I was having problems getting my car to hook good, and Kevin at Baseline took care of that with his upper set-up. He took the time to tell me what changes had to be made for my particular application. Having said that, the rest of my rear set up consists of: UPR anti sway bar, and torque box reinforcements. Wolf off-set lower control arms, and mini tubs. Everything inside the housing is made by Strange as are the coil overs and rear brakes. 60's 1.33 all summer long straight and smooth. http://motorcitynationals.com/v-web/...bum137/YOK5903

Usually, the best product is what works best for your application and wallet. The guy that runs 8's on motor may need a different set-up from the guy that runs 8's on spray. It all depends on your particular application as to what will be the, "BEST. "

Phil
boss69302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 03:09 PM   #28
4" Stroke
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: South Fla
Posts: 388

Quote:
Originally Posted by maxqstang
Ronnie Wilson has been 7.70s with the UPR setup on a 28x10.5 tire

He also went 7.80 with the Steeda stuff the year before. And that was Before More Power, a Complete carbon fiber front end, doors & ect that he added in the off season.

Adam Louramore also ran Steeda stuff in 05 and won the Drag Radial class in FFW.
4" Stroke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 04:07 AM   #29
AidanN20
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (15)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 1,088

You guys can go ahead and lock this one up...I appreciate all the info everyone gave...lots of good choices out there.
__________________
90 Mustang LX, 23k orig miles. Factory mint in/out. LSx Single Turbo S-91.5mm, Vasco th400, chance converter, Strange 8.8". 2700lb,
89 Notchback - Stock shortblock 88k mile LS1, th350, 3.73/28" M&H - 8.8", 9.9 @ 144 - 2850 raceweight.
AidanN20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 12:40 AM   #30
red89coupe
Registered User
 
red89coupe's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (16)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: almost home
Posts: 3,298

Quote:
Originally Posted by AidanN20 View Post
Please reference me to a 7 second mustang with baseline suspension setup?? I'm not bashing, im interested in seeing proven results.

I hate to be the guinea pig on stuff so I like to use whatever has already been proven....

check out the website. Mike Dees did it back in 2005.

there are tons of options out there. take a look at em all, TRUST ME last thing you want is to be unhappy with a rear suspension. Ask me how I know lol lol
__________________
Turbonetics 62-1

insanemustangs.com
krisstarnesracing.com
red89coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 01:21 AM   #31
duffman
Registered User
 
duffman's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (20)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 1,973

[
__________________
90Cobra,10.3-1, 408W,4340 steel crank,H-beams, SRS pistons,AFR 205,Vic Jr,FTI solid roller,Prosystem 950,1 3/4"LT,3",G-Force T-5,31 spline,3.73
duffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 01:36 AM   #32
1foxbody32
Registered User
 
1foxbody32's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (22)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: VA,NY
Posts: 1,084

Wolfe. Thats what I'm going to be running in my car also its very nice and proven results I have never heard one bad thing about them.
__________________
Don't get shook of a little bone stock 302 short block!!

SIRACING.NET
1foxbody32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 08:28 PM   #33
krigdon4650
Registered User
 
krigdon4650's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: meridian, ms
Posts: 253

the new wolfe torque arm set up is available but it will not pass tech in a stock suspension class.... if the car is set up well there is no more than a tenth for the torque arm in a really fast car.... but cars running 1.3ish 60's dont really need it, wolfe is wonderful quality i run it on mine and the guy who built my car uses it and he has the torque arm and hasnt helped him yet so...
krigdon4650 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2007, 09:07 AM   #34
toxic283
Registered User
 
toxic283's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (12)
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Miramar, Fl.
Posts: 460

I have all Wolfe including double anti roll bar. Went a 1.26 60' at Atco, which is about as good as it gets on a true 10.5 with a turbo. I will tell you that their mini-tub kit was a pita.
__________________
'86 GT 4.6 4V Turbo-SSO #2221, 7.89 @ 176mph
toxic283 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2007, 11:46 PM   #35
Blackfive0
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (24)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Moline/IL
Posts: 889

Quote:
Originally Posted by AidanN20 View Post
I think ill pass on the baselinesuspensions and stick to the proven setups that have went 7's-8's on many mustangs....
Not to tell you that you are wrong, but baseline is proven. Now I do have baseline on my car and I have a buddy who has team-z, if you look at the two they are dam near the same. The differance between the two I would say is everything from baseline is bigger is size.
__________________
Stock 302 short block, TFS heads and Intake, TFS 1 cam w/1.7rr, 60 lbs injectors, HP stage 1 turbo, TKO 600, 93 cobra rear 3.27 gears 31 moser axles, Detroit tru-trac.
Baseline rear suspension. Tuned by Bob Kurgan. 545rwhp 627rwtq @ 14psi

http://video.tinypic.com/player.php?v=4hrqs83[/url]
Blackfive0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2010 Corral.net