Go Back   Corral.net : Ford Mustang Forums > Modular Tech Forums > SVT & DOHC

Corral.net is the premier Ford Mustang forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-17-2009, 09:26 PM   #1
na svt
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (12)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 3,480

All B heads are not created equal

All B heads castings are not the same. The combustion chambers of the earlier castings, 93-95, do not have the same potential when used in stock form.

Many people buy B heads with the thought they all make the same power making potential. Also, there is always someone trying to pass off Mark 8 heads as Cobra heads. Looking at the combustion chamber is the easiest way to tell the two apart.See the pics below:

I only show two part numbers below but will start a "good" and "bad" list.


na svt is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-18-2009, 01:59 AM   #2
me32
Registered User
 
me32's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 957

nice pics, great info. while your add it can you give the cam info of both heads too
__________________
2008 Shelby GT500, 2921 out of 6513 coupes, 132 of 314 Alloy Metallic, Shelby Dash Plaque, FRPP CAI,KR shifter,SVT handling pack,373,TVS, J&M UCA, J&M Adj. Pan Hard Bar, Power House 4" A/D, Custom o/r H, DynoMax 3in CB, Shelby HE/RAD 592RWHP/576TQ
me32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2009, 06:16 AM   #3
na svt
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (12)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 3,480

Quote:
Originally Posted by me32 View Post
nice pics, great info. while your add it can you give the cam info of both heads too
Mark:
intake 184 deg dur
exhaust 196 deg dur

Cobra:
Intake 204 deg dur
Exhaust 196 dur

Last edited by na svt; 09-18-2009 at 06:36 AM.
na svt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 01:06 PM   #4
metalman302
Registered User
 
metalman302's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (104)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,824

The older Mark 8 heads also had crappy springs while the newr ones had beehives.

I have a 97 Mark 8 motor and it has the AD heads.

I also have a 95 Mark 8 motor and it has beehives and has AA heads. I may pull these and be able to take a peek, not sure yet. Maybe someone else can verify.
__________________
1990 GT - TFS TWs, 1.7 RR, GT40 Tubular, Shorties, OR/X, stock cam & 150k short block = 287 rwhp 322 rwtq untuned
94 V6 DD - AODE to T5
metalman302 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 01:58 PM   #5
Erich
Registered User
 
Erich's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (20)
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,577

Can the older heads be reshaped to resemble the newer ones?
Erich
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj
1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads
Erich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:56 PM   #6
na svt
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (12)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 3,480

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
Can the older heads be reshaped to resemble the newer ones?
Erich
Yup, I'm in the process of doing that to a set right now.
na svt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 03:51 PM   #7
Erich
Registered User
 
Erich's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (20)
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,577

Here are some shots of my heads before and after I had work done to them. they are 93 Mark VIII heads. Does it look like I had improvements made as far as that shrouding?


Erich
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj
1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads
Erich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 03:59 PM   #8
na svt
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (12)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 3,480

nope, they are still shrouded
na svt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:14 PM   #9
Erich
Registered User
 
Erich's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (20)
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,577

This is pretty irritating. I totally did not know there was a difference till recently. I could have easily swapped these for later heads.
Erich
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj
1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads
Erich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:27 PM   #10
metalman302
Registered User
 
metalman302's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (104)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,824

na svt, I think I may have posted this in the other thread...

Is there any truth to mark 8 heads using different diameter valves and valveseals than cobra? THe SHM book said this but there was a few errors in that book.

These are beehive springs correct? These are the AA heads on my 95 motor:



__________________
1990 GT - TFS TWs, 1.7 RR, GT40 Tubular, Shorties, OR/X, stock cam & 150k short block = 287 rwhp 322 rwtq untuned
94 V6 DD - AODE to T5
metalman302 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:45 PM   #11
na svt
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (12)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 3,480

Those are Beeehives. Also, the Cobra heads have a "Z" in the part number.
na svt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 06:53 PM   #12
Erich
Registered User
 
Erich's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (20)
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,577

I got my info that the heads were the same from that hyland book. I knew about the springs and had them changed to beehive.
Erich
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj
1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads
Erich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 06:58 PM   #13
metalman302
Registered User
 
metalman302's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (104)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,824

I blame Hyland. He even said Mark 8s had 8 bolt cranks.
__________________
1990 GT - TFS TWs, 1.7 RR, GT40 Tubular, Shorties, OR/X, stock cam & 150k short block = 287 rwhp 322 rwtq untuned
94 V6 DD - AODE to T5
metalman302 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 09:33 PM   #14
assasinator
Registered User
 
assasinator's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 578

i removed the shrouding when i ported mine. if you remember.
__________________
93 teksid 4v forged
96 mustang GT
ported heads,manley,mahley,8.5:1,80mm .56trim turbo,.84 exhaust housing, 4x28x12 fmic,14psi.
assasinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 09:36 PM   #15
assasinator
Registered User
 
assasinator's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 578

its difficult to quantify how much the shrouding hurts, but on 3v heads, the shrouding is the majority of the flow gains in ported 3v heads.
__________________
93 teksid 4v forged
96 mustang GT
ported heads,manley,mahley,8.5:1,80mm .56trim turbo,.84 exhaust housing, 4x28x12 fmic,14psi.
assasinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 09:32 AM   #16
Erich
Registered User
 
Erich's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (20)
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,577

I was wondering how much that shrouding hurts. I thought the transition and bowls were the worst part of those heads.
Erich
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj
1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads
Erich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 10:13 AM   #17
na svt
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (12)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 3,480

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
I was wondering how much that shrouding hurts. I thought the transition and bowls were the worst part of those heads.
Erich
The short turns are the worst part but the only way you can fix them is to raise the port floors. Raising them would also increase velocity by reducing the port volume.
na svt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 06:04 PM   #18
ModularSpeed
Authorized corral.net Advertiser
 
ModularSpeed's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florida/Michigan
Posts: 884

Quote:
Originally Posted by assasinator View Post
its difficult to quantify how much the shrouding hurts, but on 3v heads, the shrouding is the majority of the flow gains in ported 3v heads.
Yes, but unshrouding valves on any application helps.
__________________
"Performance Driven, Race Proven"
Kelly Aiken
727-967-3461
ModularSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 08:23 PM   #19
metalman302
Registered User
 
metalman302's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (104)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,824

Quote:
Originally Posted by na svt View Post
The short turns are the worst part but the only way you can fix them is to raise the port floors. Raising them would also increase velocity by reducing the port volume.
Do you mean you are adding material to the port in that spot?

How much hp do you think the shrouding costs on a mild na car? A few hp maybe 3-5?
__________________
1990 GT - TFS TWs, 1.7 RR, GT40 Tubular, Shorties, OR/X, stock cam & 150k short block = 287 rwhp 322 rwtq untuned
94 V6 DD - AODE to T5
metalman302 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:15 PM   #20
ModularSpeed
Authorized corral.net Advertiser
 
ModularSpeed's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florida/Michigan
Posts: 884

^Yes. You basically re-shape the runner by adding material to raise the floor, and remove material in other areas when reshaping/porting.
__________________
"Performance Driven, Race Proven"
Kelly Aiken
727-967-3461
ModularSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:28 PM   #21
metalman302
Registered User
 
metalman302's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (104)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,824

Quote:
Originally Posted by ModularSpeed View Post
^Yes. You basically re-shape the runner by adding material to raise the floor, and remove material in other areas when reshaping/porting.
How much does this typically cost for that? Would it make the low end of a NA B combo comparable to a C head?

Thanks
__________________
1990 GT - TFS TWs, 1.7 RR, GT40 Tubular, Shorties, OR/X, stock cam & 150k short block = 287 rwhp 322 rwtq untuned
94 V6 DD - AODE to T5
metalman302 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:18 AM   #22
Erich
Registered User
 
Erich's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (20)
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,577

Can't you just grind down the short side to make the transition smoother?
Erich
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj
1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads
Erich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:31 AM   #23
na svt
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (12)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 3,480

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
Can't you just grind down the short side to make the transition smoother? Erich
It's not an issues of it needing to be smoothed. A good short turn radius is not sharp. The B head radius is very sharp and grinding on it will only make it worse. In order to make the short turn radius larger you have to add material to the port floor.
na svt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 07:01 PM   #24
assasinator
Registered User
 
assasinator's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 578

imo all you can really do to the primary is add a little flow. there is a shelf and not a turn from the factory. i added better flowing valves, and deshrouded the primary. its going to add some to it. but thats all intuitive. the flow bench guys are the only ones who know exactly how to get more. raising the roof a tiny bit and altering the roof of the bowl to turn the air more perpendicular to the valve should help some also. it should have the effect of compressing the airflow near the valve and helping the short turn indirectly.

too bad the primary sucks so bad. my heads are comin off soon enough. maybe i can flow bench the stupid things this time. maybe.
__________________
93 teksid 4v forged
96 mustang GT
ported heads,manley,mahley,8.5:1,80mm .56trim turbo,.84 exhaust housing, 4x28x12 fmic,14psi.
assasinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 07:54 PM   #25
46callaway
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Rafael,CA
Posts: 781

My 98 Mark VIII heads are RF-F6ZE...
46callaway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 08:25 PM   #26
metalman302
Registered User
 
metalman302's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (104)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,824

Quote:
Originally Posted by 46callaway View Post
My 98 Mark VIII heads are RF-F6ZE...
Same here on my 97 Mark 8
__________________
1990 GT - TFS TWs, 1.7 RR, GT40 Tubular, Shorties, OR/X, stock cam & 150k short block = 287 rwhp 322 rwtq untuned
94 V6 DD - AODE to T5
metalman302 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 12:55 AM   #27
na svt
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (12)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dayton
Posts: 3,480

Quote:
Originally Posted by assasinator View Post
imo all you can really do to the primary is add a little flow. there is a shelf and not a turn from the factory. i added better flowing valves, and deshrouded the primary. its going to add some to it. but thats all intuitive. the flow bench guys are the only ones who know exactly how to get more. raising the roof a tiny bit and altering the roof of the bowl to turn the air more perpendicular to the valve should help some also. it should have the effect of compressing the airflow near the valve and helping the short turn indirectly.
Raising the roof will increase the port volume and further reduce velocity and that (velocity) is just as, if not more important than flow.
na svt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 12:13 PM   #28
570cobra96svt
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: dingmans ferry p.a
Posts: 124

Is it true another difference you cant tell, is the the intake ports/IMRC's?
The cobra has a square port & a round port, and the Mark8 has 2 oval/round ports.
Also the IMRC'S in the cobra are electricaly controlled by the ecu, were as the mark8 is vaccum.???
570cobra96svt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 12:27 PM   #29
assasinator
Registered User
 
assasinator's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 578

the primary port is the same as the cobra. one square entry, one round.
__________________
93 teksid 4v forged
96 mustang GT
ported heads,manley,mahley,8.5:1,80mm .56trim turbo,.84 exhaust housing, 4x28x12 fmic,14psi.
assasinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 12:28 PM   #30
assasinator
Registered User
 
assasinator's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 578

the imrc's for 97-98 mark viii is the same part.
__________________
93 teksid 4v forged
96 mustang GT
ported heads,manley,mahley,8.5:1,80mm .56trim turbo,.84 exhaust housing, 4x28x12 fmic,14psi.
assasinator is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2010 Corral.net