Go Back   Corral.net : Ford Mustang Forums > Modular Tech Forums > GT & SOHC

Corral.net is the premier Ford Mustang forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2009, 01:15 PM   #1
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

500 rwhp on stock shortblock?

WTF

TonyG on here running 500 rwhp on a stock shortblock...how is that holding up?



Anyone have any theories....

I always felt like the 99-00 PI engines held up a lot better than 02-04...any truth to this?
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-28-2009, 01:38 PM   #2
Steve03
Registered User
 
Steve03's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (11)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Round Lake, IL
Posts: 854

it seems the windsors (99-00) last longer when handling power. I have a friend with 2000 GT with a C4 making 445rwhp, that's like 490 thru a 5-spd. I think alot of it's long life is a return style fuel system he installed.
__________________
Steve
`03 GT
Steve03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2009, 01:44 PM   #3
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

Yea, ive noticed that...I was actually going to look for a 99-00 motor to swap into my 96 but I didnt feel like putting a motor with 100k in my car.

I got a 03 PI motor from an explorer.....hopefully it will handle some power.
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2009, 09:31 PM   #4
2kMustangGT500
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Greece, NY
Posts: 475

Regardless of what people say the Windsor is stronger. The rods are made better, the crank is stouter, the mains are stronger.....they can piss and moan all they want but the truth is the truth.
__________________
2000 Mustang GT- Gears, X-pipe, catback, pullies, DRs.

13.21@103.55 1.85 60ft.
2kMustangGT500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2009, 10:18 PM   #5
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2kMustangGT500 View Post
Regardless of what people say the Windsor is stronger. The rods are made better, the crank is stouter, the mains are stronger.....they can piss and moan all they want but the truth is the truth.

Yea...my 03 alum exploder motor is romeo, isnt it...lol
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 12:55 AM   #6
Hurstmeister
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 1,121

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2kMustangGT500 View Post
Regardless of what people say the Windsor is stronger. The rods are made better, the crank is stouter, the mains are stronger.....they can piss and moan all they want but the truth is the truth.
I've seen just as many windsors chuck rods as I have the romeo's. Throw 500 on either one and its not a matter of if,.. its when it does. 500 whp = borrowed time no matter what on stock rods.

I know a guy right now that has been spraying a 200 shot in his 98 GT with PI heads. He makes roughly 275ish NA,.. the rest is spray. Putting almost 500 to the wheels. Has been running the piss out of it for more then a year now. We are both baffled as to why it hasnt chucked parts yet.

So the whole Windsor/Romeo theory,.. 6 bolt/8 bolt bragging rights means little. I dont know of anyone who's ever broken a 6 bolt or 8 bolt crank with out chucking rods first. Both cranks hold well up to 650hp with little trouble. There is no proof one way or the other that either is stronger then the other.

Hurst
Hurstmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 01:24 AM   #7
Floordford
Formerly Fastangboi
 
Floordford's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (11)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,901
Blog Entries: 1

Its all in the tune. You can get a 350hp 4.6 to chuck parts if the tune is sorry.
__________________
2000 GT-bolt ons and suspension. 273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiresmokindad View Post
Crush sleeve is effective than axle. It is easier to replace pinion seal. I think because axle is not much popular than crush sleeve.
Floordford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 10:16 AM   #8
Hurstmeister
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 1,121

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastangboi View Post
Its all in the tune. You can get a 350hp 4.6 to chuck parts if the tune is sorry.
To a degree thats true. But once the threshold has been breached,.. particularly in the 425 - 450+ range,.. even a 'safe' tune will prevent very little.

450+hp on a 3400+lb car cutting semi hard 1.6+ 60's,.. the stock rods are going to go. Anyone with any real world experience or that follows those with similar specs know this to be true. I've personally watched this happen time after time. Some cars last longer then others,.. driving style, vehicle weight, type of power adder, and tune are all factors,..agreed. But in the end when the engine is continuously placed on the ragged edge there are always consequences.

Hurst

Last edited by Hurstmeister; 04-29-2009 at 10:21 AM.
Hurstmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 10:22 AM   #9
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

So what would you say is a safe number to run?

400?
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 10:44 AM   #10
MODMUSTANG
Registered User
 
MODMUSTANG's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MO, Saint Louis
Posts: 1,506

Quote:
Originally Posted by justinschmidt1 View Post
So what would you say is a safe number to run?

400?
400 to the wheels seems to be the consensus. You will still need a stellar tune if you want longevity.
__________________
Wingless Opel Metallic Frost 1996 GT
PI Headswap VT Stage 2 Cams
Gasket Matched PI Intake
Ported TrickFlow Plenum with 75mm Dragon TB
Mac Longtubes (slag removed) Mac Prochamber, Flows
UPR Upper and Lower Control Arms
Spec Stage 3+ Clutch with Aluminum Flywheel
4.10's in a Cobra Clutch Pack T-Lock with F-150 Spring
Weld Prostar XP's 15x9 with ET streets
Strange 10-way's all around with Eibach Drag Springs
XCAL 2, Tuned by Jon Lund
Waiting on Dyno #'s and Tracktimes!!!
MODMUSTANG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 10:52 AM   #11
Erich
Registered User
 
Erich's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (20)
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,617

Nice on the explorer motor. Takes some weight off an already lightish car plus add the PI heads. That will be a good setup.
Erihc
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj
1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads
Erich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 10:59 AM   #12
Hurstmeister
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 1,121

Quote:
Originally Posted by justinschmidt1 View Post
So what would you say is a safe number to run?

400?
The common opinion within the 4.6 community is that 420 - 430 whp is the theoretical safe limit. Beyond that the durability of the rods become a ticking time bomb.

Even at 400 whp the rods can go. High rpm dumps in a full weight car that will dead hook will eventually toss a rod. 10 passes,.. 200 passes? There is no set limit. Its like rolling the dice,.. eventually you crap out.

A friend with a 97 cobra making only 315 - 320ish to the wheels showed me a pic of a bent rod. One more pass and it would have ended his motor.

If you dont spend a lot of time at the track,.. then 400 whp is pretty safe on the street.

Hurst
Hurstmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 11:32 AM   #13
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
Nice on the explorer motor. Takes some weight off an already lightish car plus add the PI heads. That will be a good setup.
Erihc
Yea, dropping 70-80 pounds sounds good to me. I was thinking about getting rid of the AC but it gets too damn hot here in the summer.


It should be a nice setup...full pi motor, long tubes, 75 mm tb/plenum and like 10 psi intercooled with the procharger

Im not really sure what it will make as far as power....

Seems like people with 8 psi are making about 350-370 rwhp and 10 psi is like 380-400 rwhp with no intercooler and a vortech

Ive got an intercooler and im sure the long tubes will help out a bit....

Ill be happy with 400 rwhp through the auto on 10 psi

I actually think my flow masters might hinder performance...
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 11:34 AM   #14
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurstmeister View Post
The common opinion within the 4.6 community is that 420 - 430 whp is the theoretical safe limit. Beyond that the durability of the rods become a ticking time bomb.

Even at 400 whp the rods can go. High rpm dumps in a full weight car that will dead hook will eventually toss a rod. 10 passes,.. 200 passes? There is no set limit. Its like rolling the dice,.. eventually you crap out.

A friend with a 97 cobra making only 315 - 320ish to the wheels showed me a pic of a bent rod. One more pass and it would have ended his motor.

If you dont spend a lot of time at the track,.. then 400 whp is pretty safe on the street.

Hurst
Well, 400 rwhp in my auto is probably 420-430 if it was stick.

My car will never see high rpms dumps...maybe 3500-3600 flashes with the converter but thats it.

My car is also probably pretty light. Its got a bit of weight reduction....

gonna have the alum block, its a 248a car so its lighter to begin with.
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 11:35 AM   #15
Blwn2V
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 274

Quote:
Originally Posted by justinschmidt1 View Post
WTF

TonyG on here running 500 rwhp on a stock shortblock...how is that holding up?



Anyone have any theories....

I always felt like the 99-00 PI engines held up a lot better than 02-04...any truth to this?
Factory freaks happen. The only thing is that the one you hear about making 500rwhp will stick out in your mind while the other 50 or so motors that let go at 440 rwhp or so are just a thing of the past.
__________________
T-trim and stuff
Blwn2V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 11:54 AM   #16
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blwn2V View Post
Factory freaks happen. The only thing is that the one you hear about making 500rwhp will stick out in your mind while the other 50 or so motors that let go at 440 rwhp or so are just a thing of the past.

Have you seen these motors let go?

I have never heard/seen/or met someone personally who had their motor let go on them.
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 12:13 PM   #17
Blwn2V
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 274

Quote:
Originally Posted by justinschmidt1 View Post
Have you seen these motors let go?

I have never heard/seen/or met someone personally who had their motor let go on them.
I have seen a few let go, and read about the rest online which I understand you can only believe to a certain extent.
__________________
T-trim and stuff
Blwn2V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 12:29 PM   #18
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

Im just wondering how common it is...

Is it actually something common in a 400 rwhp car?
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 12:39 PM   #19
98Coop
Registered User
 
98Coop's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nashville, Tn
Posts: 570

Ive seen a few cars running 380-400 whp for a while now. thats about as high as they'll hold with a decent tune for a long time. you could get 500 out of it but that's a time bomb...
__________________
98gt~pi swap, five speed swap, L/T's, tune,3:55's. 8.9@81, 13.8@101
98Coop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 02:43 PM   #20
Erich
Registered User
 
Erich's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (20)
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,617

I was surprised to see the GT500 breaking rods at 800 hp in MMandFF. I thought they had better stuff than that in there.
Erich
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj
1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads
Erich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 08:37 PM   #21
dragrace162
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: new jersey
Posts: 114

Quote:
Originally Posted by justinschmidt1 View Post
Have you seen these motors let go?

I have never heard/seen/or met someone personally who had their motor let go on them.
dude there is no "safe" limit, if the engine isnt designed to have a poweradder, then all you have to go by is what other people say and have gotten away with.
if you want to make that much power, then just do it with a good tune take care of it. prepare yourself for the worst, if the worst doesnt happen for awhile thats good for you.
you would be a fool to double the power output of a stock engine that is not designed for a poweradder in the first place and assume its gonna be fine and as reliable as stock just because someone else told you it was ok.
__________________
~04 Sonic Blue GT Coupe
~88 White LX Hatch
~01 Silver Lightning
dragrace162 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 09:19 PM   #22
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragrace162 View Post
dude there is no "safe" limit, if the engine isnt designed to have a poweradder, then all you have to go by is what other people say and have gotten away with.
if you want to make that much power, then just do it with a good tune take care of it. prepare yourself for the worst, if the worst doesnt happen for awhile thats good for you.
you would be a fool to double the power output of a stock engine that is not designed for a poweradder in the first place and assume its gonna be fine and as reliable as stock just because someone else told you it was ok.

Im not.....Im calling it quits at 400 rwhp through my auto....more than enough for me.
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 09:41 PM   #23
nbatchler
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: sc
Posts: 174

Quote:
Originally Posted by justinschmidt1 View Post
Im not.....Im calling it quits at 400 rwhp through my auto....more than enough for me.
not enough 4 me i am shooting for the stars and so is my engine. LOL
nbatchler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 10:12 PM   #24
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

Quote:
Originally Posted by nbatchler View Post
not enough 4 me i am shooting for the stars and so is my engine. LOL
Im not so eager to do that since im already putting a new 03 engine in my car....

I need it to last a while
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2009, 07:40 AM   #25
Erich
Registered User
 
Erich's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (20)
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,617

400 rwhp is plenty on the street. And even with that, can you really get it all to hook when you need to? Better to be safe.
Erich
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj
1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads
Erich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2009, 10:58 AM   #26
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
400 rwhp is plenty on the street. And even with that, can you really get it all to hook when you need to? Better to be safe.
Erich
I dont know what I was pulling NPI...couldnt have been any more than 350 rwhp...and died off early, but even that was pretty badass with my 3600 stall setup.


400 rwhp would definitely be enough.....Im gonna find out if I hook.

Believe it or not my goodyear eagle f1's would hook from a 10 mph roll in first with the blower/ stall.


It was pretty crazy
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 03:13 AM   #27
Speeds8erM-1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (87)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pensacola Florida
Posts: 4,245

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/V...-vs_154001.htm

That car had a blower on it when he got it years ago at 18k miles, it wasnt making much power for awhile though, then it made 431 or so for 1.5 years. He raced it alot, it had a reman Ford motor in it. Car didnt see any big launches at the track, but it got ran hard often and it took awhile to blow. Then again, two other local 2v's, one with a KB 1.7 and one with a Hellion T62 Turbo didnt last long at allllllllll and neither had near the abuse this Vortech car had.
Speeds8erM-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 06:29 PM   #28
mklovell
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fremont, OH
Posts: 117

I've had mine running for over 2 years with many track runs at 400+rwhp. While I'm not short sighted and realize that running at red-line with this power on a stock short block is always a gamble, it all goes back to a good tune and treating the motor with respect. I figure in drag tune (440rwhp) I am at or over 500hp at the engine.

I rarely run the car to redline which right now I have set to 6500rpm. Usually never on the street and only at the strip. With that kind of power running to red-line on the street is scary enough.

I do believe that longevity is due in part to the initial assembly at the factory. Sometimes you get the sweet motors and sometimes you get the pissed off worker on the line that doesn't give a damn motors. All assembly line work is done with upper and lower quality control limits. Some get the good ones some get the 'just made it' motors.

my 2cents.
__________________
2003 Mustang GT-Torch Red, C&L Upper Plenum, BBK Ceramic LT's, Accufab 75mm TB, SCT XCAL2, FRPP 4.10's, FRPP Aluminum DS, Moser 31Splines, Detroit Locker, Fidanza Aluminum Flywheel, CenterForce Clutch, MGW Shifter, CC XE274 Cams/springs/retainers, ATI P1SC w/3-core IC, 10# pulley- 440rwhp/431rwtq
mklovell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 07:03 PM   #29
TonyG
Registered User
 
TonyG's Avatar

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 1,160

Detonation kill engines. Even if the engine is built with forged rods/pistons, it won't last long if there's detonation. The factory shortblock is a lot stronger than people give it credit for. When I first put the blower on in 1999, everyone was saying that 380 rwhp/8psi was the limit for the stock rods/pistons. A lot of guys were blowing their engines when they went past this, but soon afterwards it became apparent that it was a fuel starvation problem. People started breaking into the 400-420 rwhp range after the dual cobra pumps came out, and they were no longer starving for fuel. Lately, we started getting into the 500's by adding blower cams.

Also keep in mind that with the centrifugal blower, the power gradually and smoothly builds with RPMs. So its not an instant shock, like with the twin screw blowers. Another thing with the centris is that the peak power arrives at the redline, so you're only there momentarily, then you shift.

A lot of guys at this power level are mature (40+ years) and don't beat the piss out of their cars. I do push it to the limit on the dragstrip: 6k clutch drop launches on 28" slicks, near-powershifts at 6200-6300 rpms. But before and after that, the car gets a cool down and a lot of TLC. Also, I use race gas or a race/pump mixture on the dragstrip for piece of mind. Between trips to the track, the car is babied; fresh plugs, 1500 mile oil changes, etc.

I do have some weight reduction to reduce the load on the engine, tubular k, front skinnies, lightweight seats, swaybar. Probably nearly 150 lbs in weight reduction.

But I know...even with all that there's a limit. If/when the motor goes, I'll get a built shortblock and put on a bigger blower, cams, etc. But the stock motor's been holding up. It has about 220 passes at the 450 rwhp level, and about 10 passes since I hit 500+ a few months ago. I'm not losing any oil, and I'm getting 21-22 mpg on the highway.
__________________
99 2v GT, 35th, 518 rwhp, 470 rwtq
11.035/129.77/1.595 (stock shortblock)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2ak8fsodjA
TonyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 08:42 PM   #30
justinschmidt1
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 674

Question

Im trying to keep mine alive as long as possible

Im probably going to run upper 300s 400 flat rwhp through my auto


If I do go to the track Im going to be running 104 octane.


Is a singla 255 lph walbro pump good enough?
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 08:54 PM   #31
mklovell
Registered User

Trader Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fremont, OH
Posts: 117

I'm running a 255lph pump with 42lb injectors and it will only tolerate short bursts over 6000rpm. You really have to watch your fuel pressure. As well as never running below a 1/4 tank. As mentioned above one of the number one killers is fuel starvation.

In my setup I really need to step up to a dual pump Cobra tank or an in-line pump like a BBK to facilitate.
__________________
2003 Mustang GT-Torch Red, C&L Upper Plenum, BBK Ceramic LT's, Accufab 75mm TB, SCT XCAL2, FRPP 4.10's, FRPP Aluminum DS, Moser 31Splines, Detroit Locker, Fidanza Aluminum Flywheel, CenterForce Clutch, MGW Shifter, CC XE274 Cams/springs/retainers, ATI P1SC w/3-core IC, 10# pulley- 440rwhp/431rwtq
mklovell is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2010 Corral.net