|
|||||||
Corral.net is the premier Ford Mustang forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 424
|
The early lightning also needed to be converted to accept roller cams....who's the idiot at SVT who decided that flat tappet would be a good option?
__________________
I drive an SVT Contour with nearly 110K miles, what else is there to say? fubar02gt: the only thing getting smoked by a shelby is another rack of ribs so it can put on even more weight... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fayetteville Nc
Posts: 1,526
|
Quote:
__________________
-1990 Notchback(All Kinda stuff) -1995 GEN 1 L -2001 Dodge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Appling,GA
Posts: 370
|
Why are you wanting to convert to mass air? There is a lot you can do and still and still run sd. There is also a lot of misinformation on the limits of sd. Changing to mass air is a nice chunk of money that could go to other mods that will make more power.
I am not saying to not go with mass air, I just don't want to see you waste the money because of bad info you might have been given. If you do decide to go mass air, like others said, contact Ed.
__________________
2000GT '94 Lightning 383ci w/Vortech S-Trim +too much to fit in the sig. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: mcminnville, tn
Posts: 269
|
the motor is dam good.
and yes u can go far on speed density just need right tuner and tunei prefer mass air for better cam and lil better gas mileage but power can be made no problem on sd. and also on flat tappet cams |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 104
|
i converted to mass air, then went back to speed density b/c the mass air conversion for our trucks in only so tunable, and once you start getting over 450 hp there isn't much you can do to give it more fuel on the top end
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alloway, NJ
Posts: 69
|
It depends on the mass air conversion you use. Mine is based on the mustang A9L. It is about as tunable as a stock EEC can be.
__________________
94 Turbo Cobra 1993 Black Lightning - GONE! ![]() TKO 600, S-trim, Ed Curtis Heads, stock bottom end! 550RWHP 570RWTQ Only 11psi |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Appling,GA
Posts: 370
|
Quote:
If you used the Ford Motorsport kit, I don't know anything about them. If you use the A9L eec, it is much more tunable then the stock eec. I have ran my 383ci S-Trim combo with sd, and now with mass air. Even without much tuning, I am already happier than I was with sd. It was ok with the sd, but I just had too many little issues that I could not work out. All those little issues added up to it not being fun to drive on the street anymore.
__________________
2000GT '94 Lightning 383ci w/Vortech S-Trim +too much to fit in the sig. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|






just need right tuner and tune



Linear Mode
