|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 654
|
500 rwhp on stock shortblock?
WTF
TonyG on here running 500 rwhp on a stock shortblock...how is that holding up? Anyone have any theories.... I always felt like the 99-00 PI engines held up a lot better than 02-04...any truth to this? |
|
|
|
Support corral.net, please click our advertisers!
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Round Lake, IL
Posts: 687
|
it seems the windsors (99-00) last longer when handling power. I have a friend with 2000 GT with a C4 making 445rwhp, that's like 490 thru a 5-spd. I think alot of it's long life is a return style fuel system he installed.
__________________
Steve `03 GT |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 654
|
Yea, ive noticed that...I was actually going to look for a 99-00 motor to swap into my 96 but I didnt feel like putting a motor with 100k in my car.
I got a 03 PI motor from an explorer.....hopefully it will handle some power. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Greece, NY
Posts: 475
|
Regardless of what people say the Windsor is stronger. The rods are made better, the crank is stouter, the mains are stronger.....they can piss and moan all they want but the truth is the truth.
__________________
2000 Mustang GT- Gears, X-pipe, catback, pullies, DRs. 13.21@103.55 1.85 60ft. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 772
|
Quote:
I know a guy right now that has been spraying a 200 shot in his 98 GT with PI heads. He makes roughly 275ish NA,.. the rest is spray. Putting almost 500 to the wheels. Has been running the piss out of it for more then a year now. We are both baffled as to why it hasnt chucked parts yet. So the whole Windsor/Romeo theory,.. 6 bolt/8 bolt bragging rights means little. I dont know of anyone who's ever broken a 6 bolt or 8 bolt crank with out chucking rods first. Both cranks hold well up to 650hp with little trouble. There is no proof one way or the other that either is stronger then the other. Hurst |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,005
|
Its all in the tune. You can get a 350hp 4.6 to chuck parts if the tune is sorry.
__________________
2000 GT Xcal2, FIPK2, Accufab 75mm, P/p upper, heads, long tubes, o/r-H pipes, Borla c/b, 3.73, PI 3,500stall, subframes, full Cobra brakes, suspension goodies. Just about everything but cams and boost. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 772
|
Quote:
450+hp on a 3400+lb car cutting semi hard 1.6+ 60's,.. the stock rods are going to go. Anyone with any real world experience or that follows those with similar specs know this to be true. I've personally watched this happen time after time. Some cars last longer then others,.. driving style, vehicle weight, type of power adder, and tune are all factors,..agreed. But in the end when the engine is continuously placed on the ragged edge there are always consequences. Hurst Last edited by Hurstmeister; 04-29-2009 at 11:21 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (4)
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MO, Saint Louis
Posts: 1,346
|
400 to the wheels seems to be the consensus. You will still need a stellar tune if you want longevity.
__________________
Wingless Opel Metallic Frost 1996 GT PI Headswap VT Stage 2 Cams Gasket Matched PI Intake Ported TrickFlow Plenum with 75mm Dragon TB Mac Longtubes (slag removed) Mac Prochamber, Flows UPR Upper and Lower Control Arms Spec Stage 3+ Clutch with Aluminum Flywheel 4.10's in a Cobra Clutch Pack T-Lock with F-150 Spring Weld Prostar XP's 15x9 with ET streets Strange 10-way's all around with Eibach Drag Springs XCAL 2, Tuned by Jon Lund Waiting on Dyno #'s and Tracktimes!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (19)
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,323
|
Nice on the explorer motor. Takes some weight off an already lightish car plus add the PI heads. That will be a good setup.
Erihc
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj 1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 772
|
The common opinion within the 4.6 community is that 420 - 430 whp is the theoretical safe limit. Beyond that the durability of the rods become a ticking time bomb.
Even at 400 whp the rods can go. High rpm dumps in a full weight car that will dead hook will eventually toss a rod. 10 passes,.. 200 passes? There is no set limit. Its like rolling the dice,.. eventually you crap out. A friend with a 97 cobra making only 315 - 320ish to the wheels showed me a pic of a bent rod. One more pass and it would have ended his motor. If you dont spend a lot of time at the track,.. then 400 whp is pretty safe on the street. Hurst |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 654
|
Quote:
It should be a nice setup...full pi motor, long tubes, 75 mm tb/plenum and like 10 psi intercooled with the procharger Im not really sure what it will make as far as power.... Seems like people with 8 psi are making about 350-370 rwhp and 10 psi is like 380-400 rwhp with no intercooler and a vortech Ive got an intercooler and im sure the long tubes will help out a bit.... Ill be happy with 400 rwhp through the auto on 10 psi I actually think my flow masters might hinder performance...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 654
|
Quote:
My car will never see high rpms dumps...maybe 3500-3600 flashes with the converter but thats it. My car is also probably pretty light. Its got a bit of weight reduction.... gonna have the alum block, its a 248a car so its lighter to begin with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 244
|
Factory freaks happen. The only thing is that the one you hear about making 500rwhp will stick out in your mind while the other 50 or so motors that let go at 440 rwhp or so are just a thing of the past.
__________________
T-trim and stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 654
|
Quote:
Have you seen these motors let go? I have never heard/seen/or met someone personally who had their motor let go on them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nashville, Tn
Posts: 542
|
Ive seen a few cars running 380-400 whp for a while now. thats about as high as they'll hold with a decent tune for a long time. you could get 500 out of it but that's a time bomb...
__________________
98gt~pi long block swap and pace setter L/T's, diablosport, 03 wheels
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (19)
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,323
|
I was surprised to see the GT500 breaking rods at 800 hp in MMandFF. I thought they had better stuff than that in there.
Erich
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj 1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: new jersey
Posts: 104
|
Quote:
if you want to make that much power, then just do it with a good tune take care of it. prepare yourself for the worst, if the worst doesnt happen for awhile thats good for you. you would be a fool to double the power output of a stock engine that is not designed for a poweradder in the first place and assume its gonna be fine and as reliable as stock just because someone else told you it was ok.
__________________
~04 Sonic Blue GT Coupe ~88 White LX Hatch ~01 Silver Lightning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 654
|
Quote:
Im not.....Im calling it quits at 400 rwhp through my auto....more than enough for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (19)
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 5,323
|
400 rwhp is plenty on the street. And even with that, can you really get it all to hook when you need to? Better to be safe.
Erich
__________________
97 Laser Red GT-248A Wingless model, Built Lincoln Mark VIII motor-Procharger D1SC, 3 core IC, 60# inj 1989 Sonic Blue Notchback-DIY Twin Turbo, 42# inj, GT40P heads |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 654
|
Quote:
400 rwhp would definitely be enough.....Im gonna find out if I hook. Believe it or not my goodyear eagle f1's would hook from a 10 mph roll in first with the blower/ stall. It was pretty crazy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (62)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pensacola Florida
Posts: 3,417
|
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/V...-vs_154001.htm
That car had a blower on it when he got it years ago at 18k miles, it wasnt making much power for awhile though, then it made 431 or so for 1.5 years. He raced it alot, it had a reman Ford motor in it. Car didnt see any big launches at the track, but it got ran hard often and it took awhile to blow. Then again, two other local 2v's, one with a KB 1.7 and one with a Hellion T62 Turbo didnt last long at allllllllll and neither had near the abuse this Vortech car had. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fremont, OH
Posts: 113
|
I've had mine running for over 2 years with many track runs at 400+rwhp. While I'm not short sighted and realize that running at red-line with this power on a stock short block is always a gamble, it all goes back to a good tune and treating the motor with respect. I figure in drag tune (440rwhp) I am at or over 500hp at the engine.
I rarely run the car to redline which right now I have set to 6500rpm. Usually never on the street and only at the strip. With that kind of power running to red-line on the street is scary enough. I do believe that longevity is due in part to the initial assembly at the factory. Sometimes you get the sweet motors and sometimes you get the pissed off worker on the line that doesn't give a damn motors. All assembly line work is done with upper and lower quality control limits. Some get the good ones some get the 'just made it' motors. my 2cents.
__________________
2003 Mustang GT-Torch Red, C&L Upper Plenum, BBK Ceramic LT's, Accufab 75mm TB, SCT XCAL2, FRPP 4.10's, FRPP Aluminum DS, Moser 31Splines, Detroit Locker, Fidanza Aluminum Flywheel, CenterForce Clutch, MGW Shifter, CC XE274 Cams/springs/retainers, ATI P1SC w/3-core IC, 10# pulley- 440rwhp/431rwtq |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 1,093
|
Detonation kill engines. Even if the engine is built with forged rods/pistons, it won't last long if there's detonation. The factory shortblock is a lot stronger than people give it credit for. When I first put the blower on in 1999, everyone was saying that 380 rwhp/8psi was the limit for the stock rods/pistons. A lot of guys were blowing their engines when they went past this, but soon afterwards it became apparent that it was a fuel starvation problem. People started breaking into the 400-420 rwhp range after the dual cobra pumps came out, and they were no longer starving for fuel. Lately, we started getting into the 500's by adding blower cams.
Also keep in mind that with the centrifugal blower, the power gradually and smoothly builds with RPMs. So its not an instant shock, like with the twin screw blowers. Another thing with the centris is that the peak power arrives at the redline, so you're only there momentarily, then you shift. A lot of guys at this power level are mature (40+ years) and don't beat the piss out of their cars. I do push it to the limit on the dragstrip: 6k clutch drop launches on 28" slicks, near-powershifts at 6200-6300 rpms. But before and after that, the car gets a cool down and a lot of TLC. Also, I use race gas or a race/pump mixture on the dragstrip for piece of mind. Between trips to the track, the car is babied; fresh plugs, 1500 mile oil changes, etc. I do have some weight reduction to reduce the load on the engine, tubular k, front skinnies, lightweight seats, swaybar. Probably nearly 150 lbs in weight reduction. But I know...even with all that there's a limit. If/when the motor goes, I'll get a built shortblock and put on a bigger blower, cams, etc. But the stock motor's been holding up. It has about 220 passes at the 450 rwhp level, and about 10 passes since I hit 500+ a few months ago. I'm not losing any oil, and I'm getting 21-22 mpg on the highway.
__________________
Black 99GT 35th, 5 sp, intercooled V1 S-Trim 518 rwhp, stock shortblock 11.035/129.77/1.595 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2ak8fsodjA |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middletown,De
Posts: 654
|
Im trying to keep mine alive as long as possible
Im probably going to run upper 300s 400 flat rwhp through my auto If I do go to the track Im going to be running 104 octane. Is a singla 255 lph walbro pump good enough? |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fremont, OH
Posts: 113
|
I'm running a 255lph pump with 42lb injectors and it will only tolerate short bursts over 6000rpm. You really have to watch your fuel pressure. As well as never running below a 1/4 tank. As mentioned above one of the number one killers is fuel starvation.
In my setup I really need to step up to a dual pump Cobra tank or an in-line pump like a BBK to facilitate.
__________________
2003 Mustang GT-Torch Red, C&L Upper Plenum, BBK Ceramic LT's, Accufab 75mm TB, SCT XCAL2, FRPP 4.10's, FRPP Aluminum DS, Moser 31Splines, Detroit Locker, Fidanza Aluminum Flywheel, CenterForce Clutch, MGW Shifter, CC XE274 Cams/springs/retainers, ATI P1SC w/3-core IC, 10# pulley- 440rwhp/431rwtq |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|









Linear Mode
