Ford Mustang Forums banner

Lowering

2K views 20 replies 13 participants last post by  SuperChicken 
#1 ·
Not really looking to auto-X, but you guys are the most knowledgeable for retaining good driving manors when modifying suspensions. Please indulge me.

I'm looking to lower my '91 LX hatchback 5.0 with AOD. It currently rolls on stock suspension. I want to lower it 1" or so in the front and as much as 2" in the rear. I have a big and little tire package and want to bring the rear down to close to level with the front. I also want to retain stock like handling. I'm not looking to burn corners. I am satisfied with the OE driving experience, but want the car lower because quite frankly it looks better. So keeping it like stock for ride and handling is fine.

I am thinking a coil-over conversion for the front with camber plates and coil-overs for the rear with good lower control arms and adjustable upper control arms (to correct pinion angle) would be the best path to my goal. Am I on the right track with this idea?

Thanks.
 
#9 ·
Rear springs alone won't get the back of the car low enough to level (or near level) the car despite the difference in front to rear tire heights with the current tires and definitely not with the next set of rear tires.

I am running 165R15's front (25.43") and 255/60R15's rear (27.1"). If I drop the front say 1", I have to drop the rear 1.75-1.80" to make the car level. The next rear tires will be 275/60's which would mean the back of the car would have to come down 2.25" in total.

Would there be any issue with running simple 1" drop springs up front and coil-overs in the back?
 
#11 ·
:confused: Where did he say anything about it wanting to handle? He said he's happy with the driving experience now, he just wants it to sit lower because he prefers the way that looks.

Rear springs alone won't get the back of the car low enough to level (or near level) the car despite the difference in front to rear tire heights with the current tires and definitely not with the next set of rear tires.

I am running 165R15's front (25.43") and 255/60R15's rear (27.1"). If I drop the front say 1", I have to drop the rear 1.75-1.80" to make the car level. The next rear tires will be 275/60's which would mean the back of the car would have to come down 2.25" in total.
Perhaps some MM height adjustable rear LCAs, combined with lowering springs, would get you there? I don't know if that would be more economical than doing a rear coil-over setup, but might be worth considering.

Would there be any issue with running simple 1" drop springs up front and coil-overs in the back?
There wouldn't be any issue with that, but I personally think you should do coil-overs up front. If you're truly concerned about getting the stance just the way you like it, then having that adjustability up front will be important. "Simple 1" drop springs" may not drop an inch - could be more, could be less. With coil-overs you can set it where you want it. If you choose dampers and spring rates that are well matched, the ride quality will actually be better, as will the performance.
 
#12 ·
I know you're trying to basically keep it stock like, but i have a recommendation. have full length subframe connectors welded in. i had done springs and shocks on mine and didn't fully realize the benefit until my subframes were installed. They just really make the suspension work like its supposed to. The unibody really sucks and the suspension just wont do what it is supposed to until its braced. I'm not an expert, just from experience it makes a big difference.
 
#14 ·
Have you thought about RideTech?

No personal experience, but thinking as you're looking for a comfortable ride and a way to choose the aesthetics of your car, this seems to me like a good solution. Seen them use these systems on "Fast & Loud" with good results for cool looks and good ride quality. Link to mustang section below.

Musclecars :: Ford Mustang 79-93 - RideTech.com - Suspension Specialist - Online Store

Might be a good choice for your goals. Also agree that good weld in subframe connectors should be the first thing done to a fox body mustang to improve performance, ride and longevity.
 
#17 ·
Yes. I came to this subforum because the guys that really know how to improve handling probably best understand how to do what I want to do. Much the same as guys that really know how to build performance engines know how to build superb everyday engines.

What I don't want is to be low and have a hot mess of handling and ride.
 
#19 ·
Street-acceptable is not the same as "stock", and I did specify "most regulars" rather than implying "all" by default. Heavy understeer may actually be acceptable to OP, or it may at least be what he's accustomed to.

But we're just going to have to agree to disagree on how far to carry any interpretation of "stock handling". I can't feel too sorry about trying to nudge people away from a big-n-little setup in any discussion where "handling" - stock or otherwise - was mentioned. Not when it's inherently a (perhaps heavily) understeerish setup in the dry and potentially very loose under power in the wet.


Norm
 
#21 ·
Two basic key factors that were left out by op.

First being how much is op willing to spend.

Second is how much HP is op making, and will the car be run at the track with slicks.

Really can't make intelligent recommendations without that info.

Cut springs in the front with adjustable rear lower control arms will be cheapest way. Totally fine street manners with this setup, but will be a wild launch at the track.

Front coilovers and rear end with torque arm, panhard bar, adjustable RLCA would give the best street ride quality and would launch beautifully at the track.

Pretty wild difference in price between the two.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top