|
|||||||
Corral.net is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Corral Elite Member
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: So Cal/Az.
Posts: 3,465
|
Its just a stock mustang computer/ECM for a 5.0, 5 speed. Whats your setup now???
__________________
"I know it's not safe up here, that's why they called us! Now cut that hole!" I did not vote for Obama. Did you vote for obama?94 red gt vert: "Yes i did and glad i did.""OWS, The lefts Tea Party" |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Corral Elite Member
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: So Cal/Az.
Posts: 3,465
|
What ECM do you have now? What year is the car?what type of motor ,trans did your car come with?
__________________
"I know it's not safe up here, that's why they called us! Now cut that hole!" I did not vote for Obama. Did you vote for obama?94 red gt vert: "Yes i did and glad i did.""OWS, The lefts Tea Party" |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,017
|
There are a lot of people who don't fully understand the differences between ecu's, but are more than willing to say that the A9L is the only one that should ever be used.
Was the SCT chip created for your current combo? What ecu are you currently using? What are the future goals, and what is your current setup? There are some minor timing differences between the A9L and A9P, as well as fuel differences. None of the differences, that I have found, will provide a performance advantage in either computer. jason
__________________
SeattleBlueOvals.com 1990 GT - something 351w based... some day 1987 LX - n/a 2.3 daily driver, using an EDIS v8 ecu/QH |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (35)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,295
|
Quote:
I have my chip out at the moment It's SCT 4 band I have to look to see what the number of my ECU . RPM dyno tune my last motor told me he was putting in 9AL but It is not and he does not have my old ECU my set now 347 dart block, 185 AFR, comp 282xe, holley intake, 70 mm throttle body,80mm pro-m, Hi crane 6, stock ecu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,017
|
Can you please type in complete sentences?
Not trying to be rude, but I am having a hard time keeping up. As far as I know, there is no such thing as 9AL, so an A9L is most likely being discussed. So your old setup had a dyno tune. Now, the combo you have listed is in the car running on the factory ecu? But you aren't sure what ECU that is, yet? Either an A9L or A9P will work just fine in your application. But there are other ecu's that will work just as well. jason
__________________
SeattleBlueOvals.com 1990 GT - something 351w based... some day 1987 LX - n/a 2.3 daily driver, using an EDIS v8 ecu/QH |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (35)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,295
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,017
|
No problem.
Unless someone stuck a 'batch fire' ecu in your car, you won't realize any performance gains by swapping out your ecu. Most of the MAF / 5.0 ecu's are very similar in calibration. jason
__________________
SeattleBlueOvals.com 1990 GT - something 351w based... some day 1987 LX - n/a 2.3 daily driver, using an EDIS v8 ecu/QH |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,017
|
That was an attempt at being funny, but nerds are seldom funny...
Batch fire was used mostly in trucks. All 4 injectors on a bank were fired at the same time. Or maybe it wasn't split by bank? Regardless, the injectors were fired in groups instead of when each intake valve opened. The only thing I can get out of the number you posted is the year of the part E9 = 1989 Google may be able to help you match that number to a 'Catch Code'... The catch code should be on the Ford sticker though... jason
__________________
SeattleBlueOvals.com 1990 GT - something 351w based... some day 1987 LX - n/a 2.3 daily driver, using an EDIS v8 ecu/QH |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (35)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,295
|
Quote:
ISO-9001:2000 9001 1001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (35)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,295
|
IF anyone can give a little more info would be appreciated I did a search, went to a Ford dealer no luck there either. If not thanks for the help so far
Jeff Last edited by yogibear357; 05-12-2007 at 12:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (0)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,425
|
IMPORTANT INFO NEEDED!!!
what year/model vehicle are you talking about? are you using the original computer?
__________________
89 GT T5, 3.73, mac 1 5/8 u/l,mac o/r h-pipe.3-chamber flow catback, mac CAI, C&L 73mm, cat pulleys, some weight removed http://www.my5oh.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Trader Feedback: (35)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,295
|
1988 mustang 5speed LX 5.0. with Mass air
This guy that dyno tune my car said he put in a A9L it's not. Here is what I come up with for numbers on my new computer 680 ECM ISO-9001:2000 9001 1001 E9AF 14A624 AA GTE |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|








Did you vote for obama?94 red gt vert: "Yes i did and glad i did."




Linear Mode
